×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

seismic design of steel water reservoir

seismic design of steel water reservoir

seismic design of steel water reservoir

(OP)
Hi,

I'm designing a 32-foot high, 0.5 MG reservoir in Seismic Zone 4 in California, and the geotech engineer has supplied us with three different design spectral graphs by 1) Campbell & Bozorgnia, 2) Boore, and 3) Sadigh.  I've been instructed to use the most conservative of the three.  Sadigh results in the most conservative zero period acceleration, but Boore results in more conservative freeboard and shear anchorage requirements.

In past projects, I see that our company has been given a graph containing the average of the three spectral graphs by the geotech engineer, and therefore used that.

Are there any clear requirements by AWWA, or is it up to us as engineers to make a judgement call?  Can we just stick with the Sadigh graph to make it simple?  

Thanks.

RE: seismic design of steel water reservoir

Well, for one thing, using the zero period acceleration is similar to using a prescriptive code limit on the elastic response spectrum.  So it's odd to me that you recieved the three spectra for something you could have found yourself in the applicable code.

Also, using the zero period ignores the displacement controlled part of the response spectrum.  Or, in other  words, there will be a displacement due to ground excitation and you'd like to know what that is.  Then you can also ascertain the stability of the tower under loading at that maximum displacement.

Regards,
Qshake

Eng-Tips Forums:Real Solutions for Real Problems Really Quick.

RE: seismic design of steel water reservoir

If this is a steel reservoir (you didn't say), there's no reason to use seismic spectra at all.  AWWA D100-96 has a defined seismic design procedure that is applicable for all seismic zones.
Unless there is something in the California code that over-rides AWWA D100, I don't see a reason not to use it.

RE: seismic design of steel water reservoir

Whoops, you did say steel in the title.

RE: seismic design of steel water reservoir

Jed, AWWA D100 does have standardized seismic design, but also allows for use of response spectra, and perhaps half the tanks in the state are designed that way.  Design using the response spectra can give seismic loads double the D100 standard, or higher- it's not a trivial difference.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources