×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mortar Evaluation
2

Mortar Evaluation

Mortar Evaluation

(OP)
Why does the ACI 530, 3.7B, require only lab compressive strength testing (ASTM C270) for acceptance of mortar? Field testing (ASTM C780)is only to verify consistency of materials and procedures, NOT FOR MORTAR STRENGTH. Yet, the ASTM C780 tests for compressive strength.

This seems like the mason and mortar suppliers have lobbied hard for this provision to remove any checks and balance on their in place work. Other than a prism test, what other basis do we have to evaluate the strength of mortar (really interested in the strength of the entire assembly) that we are actually getting in the field?

RE: Mortar Evaluation

jike,

Compressive strength for mortar is not usually your primary concern.  No reason to have the mortar stronger than the masonry unit (generally around 1800-2200 psi).  In fact, higher compressive strengths in mortar works against the overall integrity of the wall by reducing bond strength, weatherability, etc.

Specify ASTM C1072, bond wrench test for flexural bond strength.  Check out this link to Brick Intitute's tech notes on mortar.  Lots of good material:

http://www.bia.org/BIA/technotes/t8.htm

RE: Mortar Evaluation

(OP)
Casseopeia:

Thanks for the suggestion of using ASTM C-1072.

I have a project where the mortar strength test per ASTM C-780 is 880 psi vs. 1800 psi. It seems that something is possibly wrong. This is pretty low.

RE: Mortar Evaluation

Sounds like it might be time to grout the wall solid and move on with life

RE: Mortar Evaluation

jike...your results are not unusual.  When pre-bagged masonry cement is used, the strengths are often lower than using the true proportion specification of C270.  This is probably what was used as most subcontractors prefer it.

Further, unless you specify controls on the mixing, you'll get results all over the board.  If they are using a shovel to measure the mixture, the results will be different in the morning compared to the afternoon....sand dries out during day...less stays on the shovel....so, higher relative strength given the same cement quantity.

Use C780 and pre-qualify the mortar.  Then use C780 or prisms to get relevant field data.  I suggest small cylinders rather than cubes for field use.

RE: Mortar Evaluation

Even if the mortar strength is low you may still combine it with the actual strength of the cmu unit and come out with a good compressive strength of masonry.

I had this problem before on a project. The mortar tested low, more like a type 'N' mortar instead of type 'S'. I got the information for the actual block unit strength from the mfr. The average 'unit' strength according to them could be estimated at around 2500psi. When I combined the low mortar with the high unit strength per table 2 of ACI 530, I still got my total f'm to be 1500 psi. But like you stated, the field test is more for consistency anyway.

 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources