×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Emergency Pressure Relief.

Emergency Pressure Relief.

Emergency Pressure Relief.

(OP)
Please could someone advise me on the following issue.
I am currently in the process of installating a solvent storage tank. The volume of the tank is 30 cubic meters and it is to contain Tetrahydrofuran. I have calculated that the maximum discharge requirement for the emergency relief device is 8870 NMCH/Air. I have used the method of calculation as outlined in the American Petroleum Institute (API)standard (Venting Atmospheric and Low Pressure Storage Tanks)
In this standard it states that certain environmental factors such as tank insulation can be input into the calculation to reduce the maximum required discharge rate.
However it also states that water spray systems should not be considered as environmental factors and therefore cannot be used to reduce the max discharge required.

I have been speaking to a supplier today who has told me that it is common practice to multiply the max discharge requirement of the emergency venting device by 0.3 if the tank is surrounded by a suitably approved fire protection system.

The tank I am installing will have a foam suppresion system covering the tanks entire surface area. The system will comply with NFPA 11a and NFPA 15 requirements.

Is it common practice to reduce the max discharge required from a emergency vent if the tank has a suitable water system around it?

Also is 0.3 the correct value to use as the environmental factor?

Advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated!

RE: Emergency Pressure Relief.

API 2000 states what environmental factors you can use. If your tank is insulated - 1" thick then you can use 0.3 as your factor - this is where that value comes from. API 2000 also clearly states that you cannot take any credit for fire water protection.

RE: Emergency Pressure Relief.

It is not allowed to take credit for insulation unless you have a solid PM program to enure its integrity . I also agree with Sean B about not taking credit for the fire protection systems . In a fire they often run out of resources

RE: Emergency Pressure Relief.

...and that 1" insulation should be "fire resistant",not conventional silicate types.

RE: Emergency Pressure Relief.

shahyar,
Please advise more about "fire resistant" of insulation material. Normally, I always use rock wool and calcium silicate as insulation material. Can I use the factor 0.3 for this case?

conners,
You should ask for the reference from the supplier. He may give you some supporting documents.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources