I just received a test report from a lab we ask to do a surface hardness and core hardness test of a part. They reported the surface & core hardness test results using the Vickers Low Load test. They also reported the "near-surface" test results using the Rockwell test. The part drawing specified a Rockwell C hardness in a certain range. I expected surface & core hardness done with a Rockwell test (in addition to the HV0.3) but I am confused by the "near-surface" moniker. Can someone help explain?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
ENGINEERING.com surveyed 364 product development professionals to glean insights into how their teams are performing today, and what technologies are most useful to support their processes. Download Now
3D printing has quickly expanded beyond the realm of prototyping and into the world of end part manufacturing. Desktop 3D printers need not be used for making parts themselves, but as a secondary process for producing tools. Download Now
Creating tooling for injection molding is an expensive and complex proposition. Until recently, the only way to avoid tooling defects causing air traps, voids, shrinkage and the like was to employ a time-consuming and tedious physical prototyping process. Download Now