×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

(OP)
I am not clear if there is a minimum weld size requirement on the inside of a nozzle which is welded as a full penetration weld to a cylindrical shell. The configuration is as per Fig. UW-16.1(e) of ASME Sec. VIII Div.1 but has an internal projection of say 2". There is no repad required as the reinforcement area meets the code requirements (self reinforced). My question is, if "tc" as indicated in Fig. UW-16.1(h) is applicable to Fig. UW-16.1(e) with an internal projection. Some software programs like APV shows a minimum requirement (tc), someothers don't. Appreciate any insights into this issue.

RE: Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

Any weld on the inside would be considered additional reinforcement. There is no Code requirement to weld inside.

RE: Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

Although I would add that if you wanted to count the internal projection as reinforcement then you would be obligated apply the minimum weld inside.

RE: Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

(OP)
It seems ASME Sec. VIII Div.2 has similar requirments. Refer to Fig. AD-610.1 (d-1).

RE: Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

internal projection is added as reinforcement (there is a max you can add as 2.5 t or so), but since it is taken as stiffening on the inside, weld needs not be present other than the required full penetration.
GB

RE: Minimum Nozzle Weld Size

This seems to be a subject that everyone has their own opinion on how to interpret the intent of code for.

I personally believe that figure UW-16.1 (h) is a good indicator that the intent of code is that full penetration nozzle neck to shell welds that have internal projection have a minimum size internal fillet weld.  I also believe it is not good engineering practice to leave a hard 90° corner at a stress point such as this one.

Are there any intepretations addressing this that anyone has read?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources