×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Older steel beam

Older steel beam

Older steel beam

(OP)
While looking through a 1930 vintage building (two story), I came across a steel beam section with differing flange thicknesses.  As best as I can tell with tape measure, the beam is 8" deep with 5-1/2" wide flanges. However, the top flange is 1/4" thick while the bottom flange is 7/16" thick.  Bottom flange appeared to be slightly tapered similar to S-beam shapes.

Have never come across beam with differing flange thicknesses.  Can anyone direct me to info on this beam type?

RE: Older steel beam

Never seen different flange thicknesses like that before.  Is it a rolled section or fabricated section?

RE: Older steel beam

There is a possibility that this is a fabricated section. Your assertion that the bottom flange tapered may suggest that this is an upside down rolled Tee beam with a top flange welded on. I assume you are confident that this is not simply an I beam with a welded bottom flange plate?

Do you need to do any analyis on this beam or is the question simply for interest?

On the subject of logic - I can't see any point in having differing flanges unless there is something else (for instance a concrete slab) which provides greater stability to the thinner flange.

1930's engineers would have a good knowledge of structures so it may be that they have good reason for the beam being the way it is.

RE: Older steel beam

Just to confuse things even more - Cast iron beams would have a larger tension flange.  Although I've never seen a cast iron beam.

RE: Older steel beam

LPPE,

Yes you are right. Cast iron was weaker in tension than compression so the tension flange could be bigger.

Here in the UK cast iron was effectively obsolete by 1900. By 1930 we would definitely expect steel but we are a much smaller and more uniformly developed country. In the US I could imagine that cast iron would still be used in some circumstances much later.

If this beam is cast iron its load capacity will be significantly different to that of a similar steel component.

In my experience, you will not be able to tell by simply looking at the beam. Material testing is needed.

RE: Older steel beam

There are a couple very useful publications for sale at very reasonable prices at AISC.ORG regarding dimensions, physical and material properties for a wide range of older years. You might look into that for future reference.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources