×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

(OP)
I've seen some discussion on 304L vs 316 SS in a high heat environment, but would like some clarification.  Or maybe material recomendation.

  We use tooling that we use as a form to anneal steel into a particular shape.  Temperatures reach around 1550 degrees F.  Because we are annealing, better temperature conduction is a plus.  Because it's only being used as a form, strength is not critical.  It does get a little banged around from inserting the tooling and removing the tooling.  Right now we use 316 SS and my understanding was that the naterial was originally chosen because it has better heat resistance.  However, it seems that the data that I have looked at and in thread discussions, 304L is not any worse than 316 for heat.  Can I get a confirmation on that from someone?  I am thinking about trying the 304L for cost reduction reasons.  Or if there is another material that anyone wants to suggest?

Thanks,

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

The moly in 316 helps hot hardness but not oxdation resistance. You can save money by using 304. Don't use 304L;
it has lower hot hardness. The carbon is your friend. Use 304H if you can get it. 309 and 310 are the classic alloys for heat treating hardware, but both are more expensive, high-nickel grades.

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

309 and 310 may be higher in Ni, but the don't have any Mo.
The surcharge this month for 304 is 0.65, for 316 it is 1.35, and for 309 it is 0.85 ($/#).
The 309 base price will be higher, but that will be partially offset by the surcharge, and by the longer life.

Depending on the properties that you are looking for you might consider either 430 (ferritic) or a cast high temp grade.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion never sleeps, but it can be managed.
http://www.trenttube.com/Trent/tech_form.htm

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

Like in medicine a general prescription of antibiotics is a cure all for most common ailments. Similarly L grade is suggested as the cure all. It is time one ponders seriously before making a decision. jjdavis good that you raised this issue though it has been discussed quite often. When in doubt always ask is the age old adage.

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

304L is unsuited to the temperature range you've given at least in the processes i've seen

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

309 stainless is plenty oxidation resistant enough for 1550F service.  In general it can be used up to a maximum temperature around 1900F based on its oxidation resistance.  316 and 304 type grades at their limit at the operating temperature of 1550F.  

Related to molybdenum at high temperature my experience is that moly is detrimental to oxidation resistance.  Molybdenum trioxide is non protective and if the atmosphere is stagnant can actually result in catastrophic oxidation.  

RE: 304L vs 316 SS in high heat environment

Nickel has pronounced effect on the scaling resistance and resultant spalling of SS in cyclic service.  Of the more common alloys 310 show the greatest resistance to weight loss cycling at 1800°F.

If you can get 310 SS or 310H SS, if they still produce it, I think the additional cost will justify itself due to the minimized spalling.   

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources