×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

(OP)
Dear All
I'm a mechnical engineer in the power plant. I'd like to know that if i can use motor actuator for the control valves (regularing purpose, not on-off purpose).Normally we use the pneumatic actuator for this kind of control; such as desuperheater, feed water system and so on. Even though I know the motor actuator of which technologies have highly been developed but I'm not quite sure that whether it's proper for regulating purposes or not, you guys are electrical engineers and i do hope that there would be someone making me for clarity of this my concern.

Thanks indeed and best regards

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

There are a lot of motor actuated valves out there in the petroleum industry.  They are much more reliable in cold enviroments.  I don't have any data on this but I am sure that a properly sized gearmotor will out last a air cylinder.

RACO makes a extremly rugged line of electric actuators but they cost a bunch.  I think they are doing some valve stuff also.

Barry1961

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

Control valves move alot.  This can be a problem with a motorized valve because you may wear out the motor starter quickly.

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

Dunno about motor starters, a lot of the newer motorized actuators use DC step motors that are switched by solid state electronics.  There are also battery backup systems available that allow for "fail safe" operation, e.g. return valve to closed position in event of power failure or loss of signal.

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

I would do it based on knowing all the details.

Its probably not important, but electric acutators operate slower than pneumatic.

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

(OP)
Thanks so much for all suggestions
In fact, I thought like what you suggested, what I'm concerned is we cannot do fail safe operations if power has gone as well as the life time of the motor actuator over the frequently-regulating operation but i really have no idea why the main contractor who is being awarded the project really wants to supply this type of actuator since, in my view, the cost of motor actuator is probably higher than the pneumatic actuator!!?? (I might be wrong) i'm not sure that if we consider overall an instrumentation-compressed air system (Higher capacity of compressors, piping and pneumatic actuators), we might need more investment for pneumatic system than power lines and motor actuators, don't we?

Regards

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

TAGE
It may pay to consider the environmental conditions that the intended actuator is going to be installed in and if the presence of electrical energy is ok.  Recently we had an actuator explode, through an insufficent IP rating for process environmental conditions, ingress of moisture and some other nasties caused a build up hydrogen gas, sparking ignited the gas, and KARBOOM!, actuator cover in a million bits.  Although the actuator itself did not fail and continued to operate fine, the safety risk was unacceptable.  Some actuators can be confrigured to fail open or closed (for signal loss) depending on your process requirements and depending on process conditions have in-built mechnical redundancy (for power loss) to facilitate this.  A 0-20mA control loop could be utilised where 4-20mA operates the 0-100% control and 0-4mA simulates broken wire/signal loss and will drive the valve to a fail safe position.  Depending on the scope of works, instrument air can be expensive, only an indepth study of process requirements, operating conditions, process environmental conditions, safety targets, area/location regulatory requirements, long-term maintenence goals...etc will give an idea of pro's and con's vs cost/eff. between pneumatic/electrical control systems.
Kensea  

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

TAGE, all the stuff you mention (air compressor capacity) and the things mentioned by all posters needs to be considered in your decision.

RE: Motor-Operated control valves??? it's proper??

1)Pneumatic Actuators have been proven for this type of application. It is easy to operate,maintain and test the pneumatic actuators. These can be set for the desired fail safe position. It certainly has a lead over electric actuators.

2)For your application (Power Plant)Relaible supply of instrument air is always available in the power plant.

3) For desuperheater and feed water control valve,  the duty is severe than the furnce draft and other application.

4) Electric actuators are being used for the regulating duty as well. However,due to the speed(gear box), torque, power supply and safety considerations the selection of the actuator is a difficult task. They are available in all voltage frequency, speed range.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources