UGCam, Closed Boundary-First Member...
UGCam, Closed Boundary-First Member...
(OP)
This may seem very basic but really... it's not. <g>
When defining a closed boundary for say a simple box, UG is not logical in how "First Member" functions. How does one change which side of a simple 4 sided closed profile the tool starts. Whether you choose Face or Curve/Edges the result is UG decides which side to start and it's hard to change.
--
Bill
When defining a closed boundary for say a simple box, UG is not logical in how "First Member" functions. How does one change which side of a simple 4 sided closed profile the tool starts. Whether you choose Face or Curve/Edges the result is UG decides which side to start and it's hard to change.
--
Bill





RE: UGCam, Closed Boundary-First Member...
"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."
"Fixed in the next release" should replace "Product First" as the PTC slogan.
Ben Loosli
CAD/CAM System Analyst
Ingersoll-Rand
RE: UGCam, Closed Boundary-First Member...
You would think that where you start picking is the "first member". But, that only works for open boundarys. Closed is not so. It seems to always favor the longest curve as the engage location. Changing "First Member" seems to only change the engage to a side opposite from the origional. Even then it is not consistant. My workaround for me has always been break it up into two paths. I can't believe it does not work as designed because it's really a pain with large selections. Btw, It's the same with NX from what I hear.
I like you have been frozen on v18 with no tech support so... thought I'd throw it out there.
--
Bill
RE: UGCam, Closed Boundary-First Member...
--
Bill