INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Jobs

Link To This Forum!

Partner Button
Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Flatness Call out

Flatness Call out

(OP)
I am working with a vendor who wants to spec out the folowing :

1,5 mm/2 m Flatness
1,5 mm/2 m Straightness

I think calling out flatness and striaghtness this way is wrong . any ideas?

-mechantaeus


Quote:

Work Hard and Work Smart

RE: Flatness Call out

Normally invoked as a slope refinement specified as a second callout. This is a common way to control the waviness within the total tolerance control which must have an equal or bigger envelope. Useful if the part can stand to be warped but not rippled.

RE: Flatness Call out

is OK.
But use "-", not "/". Can be mis-read.

Chris
Sr. Mechanical Designer, CAD
SolidWorks 05 SP0.1 / PDMWorks 05
ctopher's home site

RE: Flatness Call out

Is Y14.5 applicable to the drawing?

RE: Flatness Call out

4
The flatness and straightness specification is being applied on a "per unit" basis.  The flatness and straightness can vary 1,5mm over any 2m area.  The concept is illustrated in ASME Y14.5M-1994, paragraph 6.4.1.1.4 for straightness and 6.4.2.1.1 for flatness.  The "/" between the values is correct.  Also, there is usually an overall specification applied with a "per unit" specification to prevent significant accummulation of tolerances over the total length and width of the part.  This effect is illustrated in ASME Y14.5-1994, Figure 6-5.

If these two specifications are being applied to the same surface, there is no need to have both.  Since they are both of the same value, the straightness specification (2D tolerance) will already be controlled as part of the flatness specification (3D tolerance).  The straightness specification would only only be useful if it refined the straightness to something better than 1,5mm/2m.

GDTGUY

RE: Flatness Call out

GDTGUY,

Thanks for another clear explanation!  It deserves a star.

RE: Flatness Call out

...Y14.5 is applicable to all drawings.

Chris
Sr. Mechanical Designer, CAD
SolidWorks 05 SP0.1 / PDMWorks 05
ctopher's home site

RE: Flatness Call out

ctopher,
  Y14.5 is only applicable if stated on the drawing.  GD&T has been used on drawings before there even was a Y14.5 standard.  That is why it is important that the standard and year of release be noted.

RE: Flatness Call out

I agree, but it should be stated on all dwgs. Which usually isn't followed anyway.

Chris
Sr. Mechanical Designer, CAD
SolidWorks 05 SP0.1 / PDMWorks 05
ctopher's home site

RE: Flatness Call out

There seems to be some confusion with regards to the use of Y14.5.  According to what I read, It must be noted on the drawing or some other  document referenced on that particular drawing.  It IS NOT TO BE ASSUMED applicable.

RE: Flatness Call out

(OP)
Thank you all , I think I have a better understanding now, each one of you deserves a star.

-mechantaeus


Quote:

Work Hard and Work Smart

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

White Paper: Agile Product Engineering and Improved Product Outcomes
Today’s product development cycle is fraught with difficulties. Increased demands for complex functionality and reduced product development windows cause engineering teams to borrow practices from the IT industry, swapping outdated serial workflows for a more flexible and collaborative design method known as Agile Product Engineering. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close