×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

(OP)
Am I correct if I conclude that sizing a duct based on rec'd maximum velocities (V) will lead me to accepting greater total dP; hence, needing a more robust fan in my AHU.  As opposed to minimizing total dP even if my ducts become slightly larger than the velocity sizing method would pick?

And, isn't the latter the cheaper alternative?
Thanks,
- CuriouslyGeorge

RE: Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

And, isn't the latter the cheaper alternative?

Is this first cost, or life cycle?

If it is first cost then smaller ducts means cheaper and easier to install because of their size.


If life cycle cost is evaluated, you will pay for the dP in the utilities bill for the life of system.

RE: Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

George,

Olaf here again.  You should try to minimize total dP by sticking with those starting point numbers that most of the responders agreed on.  I only mentioned the "upper limit" velocities because frequently when running ductwork, you're going to be in tight spots "architecturally" and are going to be thankful for other options.  Besides, you don't have to stick to a  method for every duct in the system.  It is common to size some of the large trunks at higher DP and velocities so that you can get them through the various areas.  They will only be for a finite length anyway.  Once you start branching off, you can revert to the pressure drop "rules of thumb" for sizing.  Obviously if space is not an issue at all, run really large ductwork--see if I care!

Regarding the last responder's comments (CRG), this may be true in some cases, however; if the motor, fan and air handler get too big due to excesive dP, even if the ductwork is small, the project first costs may be larger in addition to the life cycle costs.   

RE: Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

(OP)
Hmm...wasn't thinking about the long-term costs.  Also, in this case, I should mention this is rectangular, galvanized ducting...if that factors into your thinking.

RE: Duct Sizing: V vs. dP

If you look at SMACNA chart of friction loss with CFM, velocity and duct sizes you will see that the opposite is true. As your system handle more air and as you increase the duct size to maintain the velocity, the friction loss in in.wg/100' of duct goes down.

RE: Duct Sizing: V vs. dP


What lilliput1 has said is a fundamental fact in hydraulics.
Take water at 60 deg F flowing in pipes of various sizes running at V=10 fps. The friction drops, ft/100 ft, for pipe diameters, D, 2-, 4-, 6-in would be about 23, 8, 5, respectively.

The friction drop for a given length of pipe would be proportional to f V2/D, where f  is the friction factor. Keeping V constant, and f  values dropping with increasing diameters, we clearly see that the pressure drops by friction at equal velocities would become lower for larger duct diameters.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources