×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Cobbles in PSD graph

Cobbles in PSD graph

Cobbles in PSD graph

(OP)
I need some advice on reporting cobbles as part of a particle size distribution analysis.
I test by BS1377 with help from BS5930. This standard tells me to describe mixed coarse soil as if it had no cobbles and boulders first and then to add them in to the description as occasional, some or many. That's fine but should they appear on a log %passing graph? If not it appears that they are not a significant part of the test sample and if they are included it throws out the relative % of all other particle sizes. This has cause some confusion since the ammended standard came out in 1999!

RE: Cobbles in PSD graph

Why not present both, with relevant comments?

Also, in my experience (marine SI), the weight of sample for testing required by BS can be beyond the recovery in shelby and drop-core samples. Something for you to check.

RE: Cobbles in PSD graph

You should include them on the graph IF they appeared in the representitive sample. From BS 1377-2:1990 your sample mass could be very large if you have cobbles - was it? and did the representitive sample include them?
The descriptive terminology from BS 5930 is just that, a method and means to produce a representitive and repeatable description. The advice in BS 5930 is that you are consistant for all samples for a specifc job, so don't do one thing for one sample and one thing for another.
Although BS 1377 deals mainly with soils <63mm, there is no reason why you should not include Cobbles and Boulders, IF they were in the representive sample.
Why keep stressing representitive? because its damn hard to do with very coarse samples. I have had experience of grading Rip-Rap, and they don't make sieves for that size of material, so choose your method well and keep it repeatable.

RE: Cobbles in PSD graph

With reference to the ASTM specification on testing the extremely coarse soils, the test sample size needs to be about 100 times(with an accuracy of within 1%)the weight of the largest particle existing to be representitive.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources