×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Magnetic lamination thickness
2

Magnetic lamination thickness

Magnetic lamination thickness

(OP)
I am working on the design of an electromagnet that uses silicon iron laminations.  I am looking for a formula or chart that will help me determine what the thickness of the laminations should be.  The electromagnet will operate at 0-400 hz.

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

0.014 inch thick laminations are probably a good place to start. This thickness is frequently used at 60 hertz, so is readily availiable.
Thinner laminations will have lower loss/temperature rise at 400 hertz.
At 400 hertz and say 4 kilogauss there will be audible noise with the noise increasing with higher flux density.
Is audible noise a concern?
In this application, does the flux density decrease with increasing frequency?

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

(OP)
This might sound crazy, but we are trying to get a 1.3 Tesla field in the air gap at 400 hz (the core will be "C" shaped, with a .080" air gap).

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

Worked at company where they made a 400 hertz transformer. The major requirement for the transformer was minimum weight.
The transformer weighed about 100 pounds, was forced air cooled, used 0.004 inch thick laminations of silicon steel in C core and operated at 14 kilogauss. When energized, transformer howled like a banchee. (Could hear it from a block away). (If my conversions are correct, 14 kilogauss is 1.4 tesla and one block is about 201 meter)
Transformer was made with three cores, with air ducts between cores for cooling.

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

This is cross-posted from Thread340-115215

TTFN

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

sfyten, I'm reposting this from the magnetic engineering forum (I don't know if there are rules against posting the same question simultaneously in two eng-tips forums, but it's best avoided).

 I have never seen a specific formula that you can use, however lamination suppliers do supply design tables giving the watts loss per kg (or lb in the US) for a given peak flux density, usually 1.5T (15kg) and frequency.

An example :
http://www.orb.gb.com/
(if you select "brochures" from the products menu, then download the most appropriate brochure, e.g. Non-oriented, fully processed and look on page 25, the table shows the watts/kg at 400Hz for a range of flux densities).  If you are in the US, there is a brochure for ASTM grades.

If you know your working flux density (note PEAK values are always used, not RMS) and the total mass of steel, you can calculate the total loss.  This assumes the flux density is uniform throughout the core and it is sinusoidal.  

In an electromagnet it may be possible to use oriented steel provided the flux is always in the preferred direction in all parts of the core, this is more expensive but has significantly lower loss.

You will need to design for the worst case (i.e. 400Hz), probably needing a 0.35mm grade or equivalent.

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

When the core is assembled, there is insulation and some spacing between the laminations.
Stacking factor depends on different factors, but following is probably correct for most situations.

0.014 inch thick laminations, stacking factor 0.95.
0.004 inch thick laminations, stacking factor 0.90.
Metglas laminations, stacking factor 0.80 (0.80 was give some years ago for metglas laminations)

Core will operate at 1.3 Tesla/Stacking factor

0.014 thick silicon steel laminations probably have excessive loss for this application.
When stacking factor is considered for metglas, the saturation flux density is to low and the core loss is excessive.
?This leaves the best choice being laminations of 0.004 inch thick oriented silicon steel?

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

4 mil or 6 mil are probably where you will end up.  If you require a lot of operation time at high freq and field then Metglas looks very nice.  Th elosses will be significantly lower with the amorphis material.  Remember, the noise that you hear is  a result of power loss.
When we tested standard lams we only lightly clamped the stacks.  When we tested 4 mil and 6 mil at 400Hz we had to bolt them together to a base plate, just for the lab test.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion never sleeps, but it can be managed.
http://www.trenttube.com/Trent/tech_form.htm

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

(OP)
Would the skin depth at 400 hz be a relevant consideration in determining the proper thickness of laminations?

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

If you use the core loss at 400 hertz, it is not necessary to consider skin depth.

RE: Magnetic lamination thickness

I THOUGHT YOU SAID 0 TO 400 HZ.
THIS IMPLIES DC.
WHILE OTHER PROBLEMS ARISE AT 400 HZ
THAT ARE DEPENDENT ON CURRENT, FC, WIRE SIZE,AND A FEW OTHER THINGS THESE ARE GENERAL MINIMAL AT 400 HZ.
THE UNIT MUST NOT SATURATE AT DC.
YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND A PROGRAM
TO DO YOUR SPECIFIC NEED ON THE NET.
IF NOT LET ME KNOW. YOU WILL NEED TO KNOW
MANY THINGS, SUCH AS MATERIAL (IRON OR STEEL OR AIR
AND CURRENT AND ACCEPTABLE POWER LOSSES, SIZE OF THE CORE,
ETC).

MAG-INC.COM
METGLAS.COM
MICROMETALS.COM

ARE WEB SITES YOU SHOULD TRY.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources