Calculators for the PE
Calculators for the PE
(OP)
Now that we can no longer use the HP48 or the TI89 on the FE or the PE, what is the calculator of choice? Reasons?
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS Come Join Us!Are you an
Engineering professional? Join Eng-Tips Forums!
*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail. Posting GuidelinesJobs |
|
RE: Calculators for the PE
- Hewlett Packard – HP 33s
- Hewlett Packard – HP 9s
- Casio – FX 115 MS and FX 115 MS Plus
- Texas Instruments – TI 30X IIS and TI 30X IIB
- Texas Instruments – TI 36X Solar
I like the TI36X, though last fall when I took the PE exam in a second discipline, i had both a HP9s and TI36X with me.
Programs that I had my on Ti-89 & 86 I uploaded to my computer and printed off and bound them.
RE: Calculators for the PE
Here's a link to the NCEES list.
http://www.ncees.org/exams/calculators/#approved
It seems ridiculous.
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
Ok. What more do you want? I say lets go back to sliderules!
RE: Calculators for the PE
It's not programmable, has dual power sources, does simple vectors and matrices and complex math.
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
(2) - (+) - (2) - = (four keystrokes)
In RPN
(2) - (enter) - (2) - (+) (four keystrokes)
The nice thing about it though is when you are working the answer is stored in a stack just like in the TI 89 that you can pull down and use numbers after multiple calculations. I know that it seems stupid, (I thought so) but after two days I could really see the advantages to using RPN for calculations. Try it - get totally frustrated - and keep trying. I bet you will like it once you get used to it. One of the things that I always loved about my TI89 was the ability to calculate equations and store the answer for later use, without storing it as a variable. With the smaller calculators RPN is the only way to do this. The HP 33s is limited to four variables in its stack, but its better than no variables like in the TI 30 etc.
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
Never did get use to the pollack notation. Maybe it just sounds bad.
RE: Calculators for the PE
Resplendent Precision Naturally
RE: Calculators for the PE
Be sure to bring comprehensive conversion tables. I had to convert grains (1/7000 of a pound) to grams, bushels to liters (my chart tranlated bushels to quarts), HP to W, and so forth. I spent a big portion of the test trying to convert obscure measuring units into units that the ansewers on the test were in.
I just wished someone had produced something like the TI-85 without a communications port. There is now a big market with no competition for a calculator with all of the conversions on a calculator like an HP33.
I don't think having calculators with built in conversions would change the spirit of the PE exams. Also, tests should not be dummed down to allow for the conversions, because those type of conversions are a reality since some data charts only come in one format.
Thankfully I passed the PE and won't have to take it again.
Good luck to you guys and gals.
RE: Calculators for the PE
Of course, this thread is becoming an HP vs. TI debate, just like at work. I have used both. HP works much better for me.
RE: Calculators for the PE
Perhaps your handle tells you what HP actually gives you.
No, I am just kidding, really.
TI HP dont matter to me what you like.
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
So Bill and company should of just been overwhelmed with feeling blessed or should of just turned over the windows idea to the public to do with what they want? I am not up to speed on the whole apple/microsoft history but Bill took the idea and ran with it while the others were still debating about it? Correct? Microsoft gets a bad rap but honestly, I dont think software would be at the level its at without Billy taking over (stealing or whatever) when he did.
RE: Calculators for the PE
I am not a computer professional, nor a hacker. I don't take things seriously regarding Micro-Soft (That was the original name of the company, but he was worried it sounded too much like a soft-serve ice cream).
Like I said above, I do have a sense of humor. However, I am aware of the history that happened regarding the evolution of the PC. I was working a summer job as a technical illustrator at a certain company in Albuquerque, just prior to when Bill Gates and Paul Allen were hired on. My former boss had very unkind things to say regarding Bill G., according to an interview published on the internet. I don't want to get really political here...but I have read a lot on the internet regarding the history of the PC.
RE: Calculators for the PE
Your point is taken though.
RE: Calculators for the PE
I bought an HP83 for the PE exam, sort of mastered it during endless hours of studying. The day I finished the test I threw the calculator into a hotel trash can and went back to TI. It never felt natural to me.
David
RE: Calculators for the PE
Researching the evolution of the PC is very challenging. For instance: when you look up an article, from say, Paul Allen's bio, it contradicts what other articles say about him. Another example is Steve Jobs claiming to have invented the PC. It goes on and on like that. Frequently, these early PC illuminati had worked for a major mainframe computer company (IBM, Digital), and had "stolen" intellectual property.
The small company I had been at was a beehive of excitement at the time. It was located in an old house in Albuquerque. It went on to produce the "Altair" line of computers. When I was there, its signature product was a 14-digit or something LED display calculator - a rather large breadbox-size affair.
To change the subject as bit, when MicroSquish came out with its version of word processor, I remember a person opining that the Word Perfect word processor was far superior. Later on, same thing with Excel - some claimed that Lotus or Quattro Pro was superior. But the competing companies kept "one-upping" each other withe their latest version.
RE: Calculators for the PE
RE: Calculators for the PE
Got it when I started this job a year ago because I need to... add and (more seldomly)... multiply.
But I checked out the other features as well, and found out it actually does NOTHING more than the Casio I had at school 15 years ago, except it has built in funny conversion factors (ft, lbs and what have you) and a handy cover which HP already had 15 (or maybe 30) years ago.
I believe development has really come to an absolute standstill here, I think even can openers have evolved more the last few decades.