×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

(OP)
I'm trying to use a predominantly shear wall system for a thirteen story post tensioned concrete building.  I need to assess the stiffness of the shear walls.

I have concrete shear walls in both C & L plan shapes.  In both instances, the "flanges" are about as long as the webs.

It seems to me that, because of shear lag effects, it might not be prudent to consider the entire flange length as being effective.  The question then, is how much of the flange should I use?

The other engineers in my office seem to use one of two approaches:

1) Conservatively ignore the contribution of the flanges entirely.

2) Use the entire flange as effective.  The idea being that concrete is good at transmitting shear and there will not really be much of a shear lag effect.

Does anybody have any advice that they'd be willing to offer?

Is there any code guidance of any kind available?

Thanks for your help,

Adam

RE: Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

Taking the entire flange as effective would be an unconservative assumption.  I would either use no flange or possibly take a small portion of the flange, upto 6t, as effective.  6t is part of the requirement for flanges of "L" beams in chapter 8 of ACI 318 and is also consistent with the effective flange for masonry shear walls of the same section (ACI 530 1.9.4.2.3).  It does not specifically say in that section of the 318 that the same should be used for shear wall flanges so you'll have to research it some or use your judgment.  In any case the flange farthest from the web wil not "see" much if any load from the perpendicular direction.  The simplified design put out by the PCA does not take into account any flange in its examples of shear walls for flexure.

RE: Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

(OP)
Thanks for your response UcfSE,

Yeah, my first instinct was to go with the 6t provision as well.  Would that mean that I'd really have to go with 3t then as I've only got flange on one side?

I thought that the 6t provision might be a little too conservative for this application.  Here's why:

1) For analysing my PT slab / frame for lateral loads, I get to consider an effective slab width much greater than 6t.  So there's some evidence for using greater widths in certain applications.  I'm sure that it doesn't hurt that my slab is pre-compressed though either.

2) The shear wall flanges will be well braced at each story which amounts to a bracing spacing of about 9-11 times the thickness of the flange itself.  Obviously flange buckling is not much of a concern here.

Any additional thoughts?

Thanks,

AdamP

RE: Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

I don't think the flange buckling is the concern but rather the non-linear stress distribution across the flange.  It will be greatest at the web and reduce at a non-linear rate from there out.  Instead of finding the area under the curve we average it out and take an "effective width" over which we assume a linear stress distribution.  Once you get far from the web the actual stress is very small, far being defined by the code or by your nonlinear analysis.  The 6t provision is for "L" beams that already have flange on just one side.  The provision for "T" beams is 8t I believe, but there are also other requirements for finding the effective width for L and T beams, as you know.

RE: Moment of Inertia for Complex Shear Wall Shapes (C / L / etc.)

When the added rigidity is needed, I use the PCI Design Handbook Section 3.7.1.2 and Figure 3.7.2.  If you don't have access to the PCI, let me know and I will try to post the effective widths for you for different shapes.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources