×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Compressor Reverse Flow Relief Sizing - Additonal Info

Compressor Reverse Flow Relief Sizing - Additonal Info

Compressor Reverse Flow Relief Sizing - Additonal Info

(OP)
Gents, thanks for your replies.  See additional info below.

Each train has three compression stages (LP,MP&HP).  The trains are connected at the discharge of the LP and HP machines (there is a single Glycol Absorber between the LP and MP Compressors).  There is no connection between the discharge of the MP Machines; they deliver directly to the suction coolers of the HP Compressors.  At the discharge of each stage there is a check valve (non slam type) and a shutdown valve.  The non slam check valves are mokveld type or equivalent and are relatively good quality.  The system piping is fabricated in corrosion resistant alloy and therefore the system is likely to be relatively clean (i.e. corrosion products that could cause check valve malfunctions are not really an issue).  

There is a scrubber on the suction side of each compressor.  Each scrubber is fitted with a fire relief valve.  The PSVs on the scrubbers can comfortably handle a flow equal to 10% of the design flowrate of the parallel train (each train can deliver 80000 kg/h and all scrubber PSVs can pass 35000 kg/h or more).  Various upset and trip situations have been simulated using dynamic simulation to evaluate control responses.  No overpressure situations were predicted on rapid opening of the compressor anti-surge valves, although as expected the suction pressure and electric motor load did increase.

Any additional comments most welcome

RE: Compressor Reverse Flow Relief Sizing - Additonal Info

I don't really know whether it is applicable to this case, but I remember having read once Trevor Kletz's opinion about the reliability of trips vs relief valves based on the likeliness of their failures.

He said, if I interpreted him correctly, that a trip (+ alarm), if tested and inspected regularly once a month, is doubly more reliable than a RV checked every two years. And a double trip would be 10 times more reliable if tested every month.

The trips' actuator could be thermally insulated to stand a fire situation for at least 15 minutes.

The right strategy would finally depend on the plant's philosophy and procedures for testing the safety equipment.

I recommend reading, at least, one of his books on safety issues.
One of them: Lessons from Disaster, "How organisations have no memory and accidents recur", ISBN 0 85295 307 0, is particularly interesting and has instructive value.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources