×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Dissimilar/Similar Pipe Connections

Dissimilar/Similar Pipe Connections

Dissimilar/Similar Pipe Connections

(OP)
In a Stainless Steel line, is it neccessary to have cathodic protection between carbon steel to SS connections or SS to iron bodied valves.
I have tried to research on dissimilar metals but all I can find is info regarding galvanic materials to  other metals.  Is SS (304 or 316) and ductile Iron or steel considered similar enough metals not to require cathodic protection?  Does anyone know of a table out there that shows which metals you need cathodic protection and which metals you don't?

RE: Dissimilar/Similar Pipe Connections

You probably know all of this , but:

http://www.azom.com/details.asp?articleID=1177
“This effect is also dependent upon the relative areas of the dissimilar metals. If the area of the less noble material (the anodic material, further towards the right in Figure 2) is large compared to that of the more noble (cathodic) the corrosive effect is greatly reduced, and may in fact become negligible. Conversely a large area of noble metal in contact with a small area of less noble will accelerate the galvanic corrosion rate.  "

 It is a common practise of ours to refurbish /excavate iron and or cast iron body valves and replace all of the bolts ( 12 to 20 bolts) with stainless steel bolts ( small volume of noble metal compared to the large volume  of less noble metal in the valve) ) and attach a 9 pound magnesium anode under one bolt head with a wire loop to protect the less noble valve body.

 We don't cathodically insulate the stainless bolts from the valve body because the area of the cathode ( 316 stainless bolts ) is small compared to the area/volume of the less noble valve ( the anode ). If the situation were reversed- If a large area of stainless was in contact with a small area of carbon mild steel or iron, then dissimiliar metal galvanic corrosion would possibly  become a problem. The metals are dissimiliar, but comparative volume is imortant. Some links that talk around the edges of your question:
http://www.eaa1000.av.org/technicl/corrosion/galvanic.htm

http://www.diveweb.com/maritech/features/uw-su99.01.htm
http://corrosion.ksc.nasa.gov/html/galcorr.htm


 

 

RE: Dissimilar/Similar Pipe Connections

I'd say it also depends upon the pipe contents.  In a "hard water" area, for instance, the scale deposition can greatly reduce the rate of corrosion.  That's why, in London (UK), there are many domestic hot water systems comprising a mixture of copper and galvanised pipes yet they don't generally suffer from excessive corrosion.

Regards,

Brian

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources