×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Systems segregation

Systems segregation

Systems segregation

(OP)
Hi, I'm new on this forum and am wondering if someone could help me out with a fairly straightforward multiple choice question that I recently came across:

From an aircraft safety perspective, what would improving systems segregation achieve?

better maintenance access?
enhanced systems integrity?
longer component life?
an optimum system installation?


Thanks for your assistance!

RE: Systems segregation

I vote enhanced system integrity.  By seperating systems a localized failure doesn't affect both systems.

Once you consent to some concession,
   you can never cancel it and put
    things back the way they are.
         ---Howard Hughes---

RE: Systems segregation

The question is rather poorly written.  Segregation is digital.  Two systems are either segregated, or they are not.  "Improved segregation" is non-sensical.

I vote for "none of the above".

Imagine:

System A is a safety-critical system.  System B is not safety-critical.

If system A and system B are are segregated, then:

A failure of system A results in something bad happening.

A failure of system B does not.

If A and B are not segregated then:

A failure of system A results in something bad happening.

A failure of system B may casue a cascade failure of system A.

You need information regarding the reliability of the systems and access to the FMECA to correctly answer the question.

RE: Systems segregation

MintJulip,
Not entirely so.
A DC-10 has 2 segregated hydraulic systems. (Dual Systems)
An improved segregated system would be one where the 2 systems were physically separated a significant distance, so 1 penetration of the area by a sharp object didn't disable both systems. (Sioux City, Iowa)

RE: Systems segregation

Segregated systems can enhance system integrity by reducing common mode failures.  In this case, the system integrity might be mutually exclusive with operational integrity.  Safety system components may shutdown a system that would otherwise be operational.  The probabability is increased for eliminating an unsafe situation.  This could mean increased downtime.

My background is the hydrocarbon processing industries such as offshore oil and gas, refining and petrochemical manufacturing.  We want a balance.  We segregate the shutdown system from regulatory process control.  We implement triplicated or quad shutdown processors and multiple sensors and controls to increase operation on-time.  A simplex or redundant voting shutdown system may be more safe; to shutdown the process on-deman.  The triple or quad systems balance to protect from bad sensors, etc. that cause annecessary trips.

John

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources