×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Transition Reynold's Number Range

Transition Reynold's Number Range

Transition Reynold's Number Range

(OP)
If you calculate the Reynold's number of the fuselage to be about 10^6 and the wings to be about 3e5 of a high-speed, small-scale aircraft, is it possible to have a higher profile drag on the wings than the fuselage?

I'd appreciate any help on the subject, and would love to get references with page numbers.  I've been using Hoerner's and Raymer's books, but I would like confirmation.

RE: Transition Reynold's Number Range

With out doing the math myself .... (I dont have your model) but it should be possible. Given drag is results dirrectly in proportion to surface area as well as the area of first contact (leading edge or nose of the fusilage) so if the total surface area is greater on the wings and or the leading edge areas is greater...).

Dont forget that there are areas of greater resistance to airflow around wheels struts and any non-conforming pods/bays holding them if they close for flight.

If this is too simple an answer then youre stuck doing the math again.

RE: Transition Reynold's Number Range

What most agree on is that for  a low Reynolds number flow, the inertia forces are negligible compared with the viscous forces, whereas in a high Reynolds number flow, the viscous forces are small relative to the inertia forces. And at low Re skin friction drag dominates, while at high Re pressure drag dominates unless separation can be avoided.
   RE = Inertia Forces/Viscous Forces

http://www.centennialofflight.gov/essay/Theories_of_Flight/Real_Fluid_Flow/TH9.htm
http://www2.eng.cam.ac.uk/~tph/L6.pdf
http://www.ame.arizona.edu/courses/ame331/Lectures/Chp9_331.pdf

For text book see “Aerodynamics or Naval Aviators” page 54-60.
Chears!

RE: Transition Reynold's Number Range

(OP)
Thanks for the info!  I'm assuming that this is a clean aircraft (no landing gear, pylons, et cetera).  However, due to the fact that Re is below critical Re (<500,000) for the wings and above critical Re for the fuselage, I seem to be getting higher profile drag contributions from the wings than the fuselage.  Intuitively, one would think that the profile drag of the fuselage would be greater than the wings.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources