×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Sludge Drying & Incineration

Sludge Drying & Incineration

Sludge Drying & Incineration

(OP)
We have an existing STP with belt press (4 units) handling 63 mgd, the solids conentration after the belt press is 20%. We desire to incinerate the sludge:
 1- Can we incinerate the sludge directly after the belt press or we have to dry it first & what are the recommended methods for drying & incineration?
 2- Can we by-pass the belt press process, so we go directly from the anaerobic digestors then drying then incineration?

RE: Sludge Drying & Incineration

Dear ARJ00,

Keep in mind that to dry your sludge you need 1000 BTUs for every pound of water vapor removed.  If you recover the heat, by condensing the water vapor and preheating the sludge, then you can be very efficient.

Why go through the process of heating the sludge then incinerating it.

Simply, thermally oxidize underwater as it is pumped from from the digester.  The Plasma Whirl ArcLight has demonstrated this.  A full scale unit is currently being tested.  see:  www.oxilume.com

  

Todd
www.oxilume.com

RE: Sludge Drying & Incineration

It depends on the type of incinerator. If you go with a multiple-hearth incinerator, you need 15% dry solids in the feed sludge. If you go with a fluidized bed incinerator, then you can probably skip the belt press.

RE: Sludge Drying & Incineration

From some research I did on some fluidised bed incinerators, I found that a dry solids content of >30% was needed to achieve autothermal conditions.

Digested sludges have had most of the available volatile carbons ect broken down, so consequently have a much much lower energy output when burned.

Increasing the proportion of secondary sludge in the mix will also decrease the energy output and will no doubt cause you more problems with dewatering too.
The plant I worked at used separate thickening streams for primary and secondary sludges (picket fence and aquabelt respectively) before being combined and dewatered in plate presses.

Hope this helps

Paul
 

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources