×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing
2

Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
Would anyone be able to direct me to references on the topic of calculating the lubrication characteristics in full complement roller bearings, with particular reference to the oil film thickness between the counter-rotating surfaces at rolling element contact.

The application involves a planet bearing in which the rolling elements experience varying accelerations up to 130 g, particularly due to the centrifugal and coriolis effects. This leads to tangential forces - i.e. between adjacent rollers.

While some bearing manufacturers recommend full-complement bearings in planetary systems, there are also recommendations to avoid them in cases where significan roller-to-roller loads can be generated, and in high speed applications.

Basically I would like to be able to verify the concerns with some calculations. Papers with specifics on the first principle calcs seem to be hard to come by.

Any pointers would be appreciated.

With thanks
Francis

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

Rolling Bearing Analysis by Tedric A. Harris (2000)
There is also a previous version.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
Thanks for that - I'll see if I can dig it up.

Anything online specific to this problem?

With thanks
Francis

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

One of the major concerns under
heavy loads and high speeds is
that the adjacent rollers surfaces
turn in opposite directions with
respect to each other thus magnifying
the problems.  That is why they
use cages in these bearings or at
least rocommend them.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
Thank you - that is precisely the point I hope to be able to illustrate by means of some analysis from first principles. I would like to be able to do the hydrodynamic calculations to derive the expected oil film thickness for the particular application with our given the roller speeds, loads, lubricant properties etc.

Anybody got the equations somewhere for reference? Have there been any papers on this application (full-complement roller bearings with loads between rolling elements due to the centrifugal and coriolis accelerations introduced by the planet motion)?

Francis

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

One point worth mentioning here, since a planetary was mentioned, is that if you use caged bearings in the planets, because of centrifugal effects, they must have a land riding cage, not the more common roller riding type. That is why many planetary designers avoid the problem by using full complement bearings. And on balance, you may have fewer problems with those than you would with land riding cage types - depending on the speed.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
Thanks English Muffin. True - the cage has been the area of concern. I would like to determine what the critical speed and loading conditions would be for the full complement option.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

I could be wrong about this, but I think the main reason that full complement roller bearings have a lower speed rating than caged rollers has more to do with roller skewing than lubrication. I think the type of lubrication that occurs between the rollers should be primarily hydrodynamic, rather than the elasto-hydrodynamic behavior that occurs at the rolling contacts. So if anything, if it were a matter of lubrication alone, it would seem to me that the lack of a cage should actually promote better lube because of the higher relative sliding velocity.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
On the basis of some discussion with manufacturers, it appears that for signicant acceleration fields as in our design, an outer-ring guided cage would be more in our interests. It was argued that the caged arranged would provide more effective entrapment of the oil between sliding contacts, whereas the high relative velocity in opposite directions at the full-complement roller interface would tend to discourage oil entrapment.

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

Well, if they are right I don't really deserve a star for my comments. If you apply either elasto-hydrodynamic or plain hydrodynamic theory, assuming enough oil gets to the contact zone, it would appear to me that the higher the entrainment velocity, the thicker the oil film should be (eg see "Ball Bearing Lubrication" - Hamrock & Dowson). You only need a tiny amount of oil if the surface finish is good. I would also think that the type of lubrication supply would be a factor - sometimes in a planetary oil is supplied through a radial feed hole directly into the bearing, and in such a case I find it hard to believe that the inter-roller contacts would become starved, regardless of rotational velocity, although you may not be using this method of course. However, there is no doubt that a caged bearing is generally  superior if you can put up with the lower capacity (less rollers). But if it's a planetary, just make sure it's not a roller riding cage!

RE: Oil film between rollers in full complement bearing

(OP)
Unfortunately I don't have Hamrock & Dowson handy, however the argument goes along these lines:

Whatever the relative speed between the two objects you are trying to build a film between you need a route to get oil into that contact.  A classic journal (plain bearing) gives that (like in some areas of the cage contacts) in the form of the characteristic wedge.

In the case of a full complement bearing the rollers touching one another have a surface velocity in opposite directions, which does not entrain oil. In fact quite the opposite - oil is swept out of the contact.  Despite giving a high relative velocity, good film formation will not occur.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources