×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Live Load Deflection

Live Load Deflection

Live Load Deflection

(OP)
Should I calculate the deflection based upon the full live load or the reduced live load when comparing it to L/360?

In this particular case, my reduced live load is 64% of the full specified live load. It is a hotel beam supporting the precast at the corridor.

RE: Live Load Deflection

JIKE:  What is the reduced live load?  Building and City codes usually specify the design/stress/deflection criteria to be used.  In a public structure, I would say be conservative.

Regards
Dave

RE: Live Load Deflection

jike,

Be consistent with your design approach in sizing the beam. If you used the reduced live load to design the beam, use the reduced live load for serviceablity. The purpose of the reduction is to account for the fact that the structure may never actually see the full live load. In other words, compare apples to apples.

If you are comfortable from a design standpoint that the beam will not fail using the reduced live load, the same should apply for the deflection.

Good luck.

RE: Live Load Deflection

Reduced live load is the one to use..this is the true live load applied to the member taking into account the statistical nature of the live load on large areas.

RE: Live Load Deflection

I must agree with JAE.

Lutfi
www.cdeco.com

RE: Live Load Deflection

I really try not to use live load reduction on any flatwork members (beams, slabs) mainly due to future lawsuit implications (wall cracking and window damage).  I agree with the statistical reasoning for using reduced live load, but just can't bring myself to use them for flatwork knowing that we (structural engineers) are the first to get sued by a condo association or building occupant when cracks form.

RE: Live Load Deflection

Jike
I support the viewpoint to be consistent. You size members with both strength and serviceability considerations. If the tributary loading area of the beam is larger than, say, 80 sq.m, the reduction factor should be used. The 1/360 limit was setup for damages like cracks, etc.

RE: Live Load Deflection

I don't understand why you would design for full live load for deflection but a reduced live load for strength. If the beam could fail under full live what would it matter what the deflection is? So I also think you should be consistent with whichever you choose.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources