×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Low Noise POTS

Low Noise POTS

Low Noise POTS

(OP)
Can someone recommend a high quality and very low noise potentiometer for a robotic application?

One that can be used with a very low order filter or no filter at all.

Thanks.

RE: Low Noise POTS

First; POTS usually means Plain Old Telephone System. So I was intrigued by the question about low noise. Interesting, I thought.

Back to order: Pots for robotic applications are not a good idea. The noise is not the main problem - the life is. I would look at contacless potentiometers like Hall and magnetoresistive devices. Usually, encoders and resovers are used in robotics.

RE: Low Noise POTS

Hi, just look for pots designed for servo applications, there are loads to choose from but be prepared to dig deep in your pocket.

RE: Low Noise POTS

(OP)
skogsgurra,

I am currently using very low resolution encoders, we are talking 128 PPR.  The problem is I am not using an onboard counter to compute angular rotation. I am using a non-conventional method where I sample the input pins and determine position. This is causing discontinuities in my  velocity and acceleration measurements.  Hence, the idea of a POT.

cbarn24050, thanks for the tip.  

RE: Low Noise POTS

knji,

Check out the conductive plastic potentiometers from Bourns. Example at...

http://www.bourns.com/pdfs/6674.pdf

Skogsgurra's comments are very valid. Encoders and resolvers are better for long term reliability. I have had exceptionally good results with Balluff's MicroPulse magnetostrictive sensors, but you pay for the quality.

Variohm make (relatively) low cost linear sensors using potentiometer technology. Not as good as the Balluff MicroPulse, but if ultimate accuracy, longevity and survivability aren't top priority then they are well worth a look. In my industry a totally reliable £2000 sensor is a bargain compared to a fairly reliable £200 sensor when one failure costs tens or hundreds of thousands in lost production.

----------------------------------

If we learn from our mistakes,
I'm getting a great education!

RE: Low Noise POTS

(OP)
ScottyUK,

Thanks for the link.  I decided to stick with the encoders and use the onboard counter of the DAQ.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources