×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

high pressure reactor problem
2

high pressure reactor problem

high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
Hi!
I´m currently calculation of the dimensions of a small (inside diameter 100 mm, height 200 mm)) cylindrical lab reactor with a flat head closure (like a blind flange with bolts). THe working pressure is 120 bars.

The flat head blind fange type of closure have three approx 10 mm round threaded NTP holes for inlet, outlets and pressure transmitter.

My problem is that I don´t know how to calculate the desired flange thickness. COuld you give me some ideas how to to this and in idea of the desired amounts of bolts and dimension of these?

best regards

Andy

RE: high pressure reactor problem

Andy-

You didn't mention the material of construction or temperature, but the easiest/cheapest way to go is to get a pipe with a (probably) CL-900 raised face weld neck flange on each end with matching blind flanges. Standard stuff per ASME B16.5. Just be sure to match your actual material to the pressure/temperature ratings. You may have to move to a heavier flange class.

jt

RE: high pressure reactor problem

jte,
For weld neck flange ANSI 900# of NPS 4 in, The length (flange face to neck) is 121 mm. For both ends, the length will be 242 mm (greater than 200 mm). This may not be conformed to the requirement of Andy.

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
THanks for the answers!

although I wasn't clear enough. The head of the vessel will be buildt according to my specs. The head of the vessel will be flat and bolted to the cylindrical vessel. This flat head will have four 1/8 or 1/4 " threaded inlets/outlets for the connnection of pressure transmitter, processmedium in/out etc.

THe reactor will be working at maximum 100 BArs but have to withstand 200 Bars (test pressure)

I can calculate the desired shell thickness and the desired flat head thickness (without drilled holes).

My problem is that I don't know how this holes in the flat head will affect the construction and how much thicker the head have to be in order to withstand the working pressure.

Is there an approx empirical formula for this or do you have to use finite elements calculations?

This reactor is for lab test pruposes only.

best regards

Andy

RE: high pressure reactor problem

First calculate the blind thickness per UG-34 formula (2). Then use any excess thickness/provide a repad for reinforcement.

RE: high pressure reactor problem

PAN-

Yes, that's just the engineer in me. Trying to take a proposal and suggesting a way to perhaps achieve the same goal at substantially less cost. Perhaps the laboratory calculations could be changed for less cost to match off the shelf components. If, however, the dimensions are critical, then of course the shell must be custom fabricated along with the blind flange.

Andy-

It would be interesting to get quotes from a fabricator for both approaches. Let us know what the difference in cost is.

This is all assuming that although excempt from the scope per U-1(c)(2)(i) that a design per ASME VIII Div. 1 is acceptible. For lab use I would tend to order the vessel "designed per ASME VIII-1 but not stamped."

You said that you already know how to calc the head thickness (VIII-1 UG-34(c) formula (2) as codeeng pointed out) and are now stuck on the opening calc's. Take a look at VIII-1 UG-39. The easiest way to provide reinforcement if you are having the blind custom machined is to add some excess thickness to the flange thickness and take credit for it as reinforcement. The easiest way to provide reinforcement if you are buying a B16.5 flange is to use something like a Thredolet (http://www.bonneyforge.com).

jt

RE: high pressure reactor problem

The calculation of multiple openings in either a standard or customer fabricated Blind can be appracohed in the same way as normal openings in a vessel.

ASME B16.5 does actually allow you to tap holes upto a stated size into a blind without considering reinforcement.
However, this assumes only one hole per blind and that the hole is located in the true center of the blind. In this case we have 3 connections (assumed to be all in one blind). Therefore the ASME B-16.5 exempts do not apply.

The best appraoch is to apply DIV. 1 calculations per para's UG-36 thru UG-39. Be carefule of your limtis of reinformcent as these should not over lap or exceed the RF the RF dia of the blind. A commonly over looked problem. Also since we have 3 connections we need to be careful of the UG-36(d) cluster conditions/restriction that norally no do apply to exempt nozzle openings.

You may claim surplus materials in your blind. This can be done be perfroming the design calcuation to determind Thickness required for pressure. I generally do not claim this value however as most B16.5 flanges we claculated actually failt to meet the required thickness. But are accepted by the industry due to service experience.



I have performed similar calc's for DIV.1 U-Stamped vessels and have had few preoblems obtaing Canadian Registration Numbers (CRN) approvals.

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
thanks for all the answers!

I live in sweden and I don´t have the ASME. Although I think I get the idea with the reinforcement and I´ll see if I can find anything similar.

-JTE I´ll let you know about the costs when it´s finished.
 
best regards

andy

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
by the way, the reactor is for in house lab use only.

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
could anyone give me an apporox thickness increase of the flat head when adding  three 1/4 " tappings (holes) to it?

RE: high pressure reactor problem

dramarc-

A temperature and material of construction is necessary data which you need to provide. For carbon steel no higher than say 200°C your req'd thickness would be around 65 mm. Assuming the openings are several diameters away from each other and the gasket surface, the additional thickness for reinforcement would be around 33 mm for a total of around 100 mm. These are "talking numbers", not final, engineered numbers!

jt

RE: high pressure reactor problem

Actually you do not need any special requirements on this flange,you can have as large as 1- 50mm opening w/o any compensation, so 4 small 1/8 and 1/4 openings comply with ASME Code,
note that thread'olets will do nothing to reinforce a flat plate on this condition, the opening is still there,
a pad! same condition, only added thickness or a buid-up pad can make a difference,
ER

 

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
The working temperature is 20 to 40 degrees C (room temp.)
MAterial i stainless steel SS2346.

A 65 mm thick lid seems really thick! Accroding to my calcs (minimum values) a lid 2 cm thick is required when the shell thickness is 1,5 cm. this is a lid without the four 1/4 " holes.
HOw do you reason to come up with 6,5 mm thick lid?


RE: high pressure reactor problem

genralboiler-

Ummm... I think you are referring to the reinforcement exception in UG-37(c)(3). Unfortunately, per UG-37(c)(2) that paragraph is only applicable to cylindrical or conical sections or formed heads. Unless I missed something, there is no exception in VIII-1 for reinforcing openings in flat heads.

Not sure about your claim of a Thredolet being useless. Can you elaborate?

dramarc-

It all depends on what formulas you are using and what allowable stresses you are using. I made the calc based on ASME VIII-1 using 20000 psi as an allowable stress. On the other hand, I may have miscalculated...

jt

RE: high pressure reactor problem

dramarc, assuming your SS2346 may be taken as equivalent to a SS304 (it is not anyway allowed under ASME VIII, if you can use a forging per ASME II it would be better) and using a 4" class 900 flange+blind (a very good advice given above by jte, it requires 8 bolts 1 1/8" dia.), the working pressure could be as high as a little more than 140 bar (at less than 50 °C temp., and don't worry about the 200 bar test pressure, it is OK for that).
Now the standard thickness of the class 900 blind is 44.5 mm (plus the thickness of any raised face). I'm pretty sure that this thickness will take much more than your pressure, especially if you use an O-ring gasket (for such small flanges the required thickness may greatly vary with bolt and gasket materials).
Concerning the openings, GenB is correct: if their centerlines are spaced apart more than the sum of their diameters (when taken 2 by 2), threaded openings as small as 1/8" or 1/4" do not require any reinforcement : in other words the cover thickness stays with the thickness calculated without openings.

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

RE: high pressure reactor problem

jte,
I am talking about excempted openings in flat heads and flanges, the flat plate will be only weakened if ligament efficiency is affected.
In this case if the small openings are in the 2in perimeter or far apart as per not affecting efficiency is also okay,
I do not have the Code with me but 2 diameters apart is the excemption.

as per the thred'olets being useless
it is only my engineering thinking; they may have some reinforcing properties but the Code will not recognize that.
GB



RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
HI all and thanks for all answers!

I´ve another crazy idea. THe reactor is still a shell with a flat plate closure. THe internal diameter of the shell is 10cm and the outer diameter is 17 cm. In order to se throuth the reactor I´ll sight glasses. The sightglasses are mounted in a stainless steel cylinder with a 2" NTP mal tread coonection.
I´ll attach 2 sightglasses of this kind directly into the shell approx 5 cm height from the bottom. Do you have any formulas to use in order to calculate the max strain/stress in the material due to the addition of these sightglasses?

best regards
Andy

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
the sightglasses will be connected on "opposite" sides of the cylinder in order to be able to look through the reactor.

RE: high pressure reactor problem

If you mean that the shell is 35 mm thick, then I see no concern with opening reinforcement, just drill a hole and tap it. As I assume the bolt holes for the caps are also drilled into that thickness, you only need to be sufficiently far apart from those holes: would suggest the solid material between the closest points of the finished holes to be at least equal to the minimum required shell thickness.

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

RE: high pressure reactor problem



Great way to design a pressure vessle, who needs outsourcing!

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
Prex, the sightglass is attached in the sight glass unit. THe sightglass unit has a 2" NTP male connection. No other holes than the 2" NTP is necessary for the sight glass unit.


best regards

andy

RE: high pressure reactor problem

I mean the bolt holes for the end flat covers, supposing they are tapped into the 35 mm thickness.
I think that to go further in the advice you should provide drawings, but suppose this is not the best place to go that deep.
If you don't intend to use welding in assembling the animal and it will contain only a cold liquid under pressure, you might decide to go on and use the hydrotest to insure that the vessel will withstand the working pressure.
Otherwise my advice is that you have your design reviewed by an experienced engineer.

prex

http://www.xcalcs.com
Online tools for structural design

RE: high pressure reactor problem

(OP)
Prex! thanks for your answers and advices!
Obviously I´m not an structural engineer and yes, my drawings will be reviewed but an experienced engineer. I´m in a totally different field but I use this thread to learn and compare with my "own calculations"  which will not totally be the "foundation" for the construction.

And yes there will be no welds on this one and therefor quite a monster!

Got a good name for it? ;)

RE: high pressure reactor problem

I agree that we've probably gone too far in detailed design for this vessel where an engineer needs to be directly hired to figure all these details out.

GB-

When you get a chance, could you look up what paragraphs in the Div 1 provide the excemption you're referring to? I don't deal with many flat heads but am interested in learning more.

jt

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources