×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

3/4" Dolomite
2

3/4" Dolomite

3/4" Dolomite

(OP)
I specified the use of "3/4" dolomite" for final grading of a site.  What I get from the contractor is "well graded dolomite" in accordance with ASTM's standard size #57 which, according to the contractor, is graded 3/4" stone.  The average size of dolomite delivered is significantly smaller than 3/4".  

I did not specifically say "well graded" "graded" or "average" when refering to dolomite. Based on my specification of...  3/4" dolomite, is that enough to turn down this delivery?  

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

To meet AASHTO #57, 25-60% of the sample must pass the 1/2" sieve, and must 100% must pass the 1 1/2".  There is no criteria for 57 stone relative to 3/4" sieve.

Well Graded is a USC subclassification relating to the uniformity of the sample; it does not specify a diameter.

Have the contractor supply a certified bill of lading ("ticket") for the delivery.  If the d50 is not 3/4" you can turn it down.  If it is 3/4", you can't.

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

WhiteLotus:

Is there a reason to specify the 3/4" dolomite vs a well graded stone?  

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

(OP)
Thank you lha!  Thats what I was hoping for.  The documentation they submitted doesn't contain a D50 value.  It simply states "ASTM 57" and the source location in the description field.

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

I am not familiar with ASTM 57...make sure it does not mean 3/4" stone.  If it does mean 3/4" stone, I would not turn it back, unless I could prove it doesn't meet that standard.

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

WhiteLotus - I think this is a case, and many of us need to sit back and think, where a bit clearer indication of what you really wanted should have been clarified in the specs.  If you wanted 3/4" clear stone (i.e., single size) why not have specified that?  It is always better to give a specific definition (with gradations, atterbergs, AIV or LA Abrasion, etc.) when putting into specs and this will minimize problems.  I see far too often the use of earth fill, soil fill, etc.  Not very technical - and clearly not clear in its meaning.

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

(OP)
Jheidt - Well graded is prefered.  Single size crushed stone just isn't as easy to walk/drive on as a well graded mix.  

lha - Your AASHTO #57 descirption is dead on with the ASTM 57 description I have.

BigH - You are absolutely right!!  At my company, we have standard boilerplate specifications for certain jobs/mateirals/etc. that we refer to when preparing a new spec.  When I was writing this specification two years ago, I was more concerned with the details of the concrete and steel portions of the job than I was with the grading.  Not to trivialize it, but dolomite was the absolute least of my worries.  

Looking over some old specs involving dolomite, with the exception of one project, all specifications simply required " 3/4" Dolomite".  I guess we've just been lucky all these years.  Either that, or consistently duped.  Either way its not something i'll leave to chance in the future.  

Thanks to all for your assistance

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

WhiteLotus...your specification was not "specific".  In many areas, a No. 57 stone is considered to be a nominal 3/4" material.  Yes, it's top size is more on the order of 1", but the predominance of material will be in the 3/4" and smaller size.

As BigH said, why not specify what you want?  There's no reason to be vague in a specification unless you don't know what you want or need, in which case you shouldn't be specifying it without some help.  Further, don't specify something without knowing the parameters.  If you specify a No.57 stone, it should be properly specified to comply with ASTM C33, Gradation 57.  This incorporates more than just the size range of the gradation....it incorporates durability and reactivity issues as well.  If you want a well-graded material, then specify according the the Unified Classification System or some other accepted engineering classification criteria for aggregate or soil (in your case you apparently wanted a GW, with max. size 3/4").

What you specified is not clearly rejectable.  I would argue that you were unclear and that the contractor met the generally understood criteria of a "near 3/4" stone commonly used for your application.  You'd be hard pressed to refute it without a better specification.

RE: 3/4" Dolomite

Another point is what is availble in your area. Some areas will sell #57, some will sell 3/4" others will sell by local DOT Spec No. It depends a lot on how the DOT, Highway Authority or county specifies it stone requirements. If you want something different than what is commonly available, You will pay big bucks. Generally it is not worth it for small differences in size. Call a few suppliers and match the specs to what is readily availble locally.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources