×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

(OP)
I am a frustrated highway bridge engineer trying to figuure out how to distribute the longitudinal loading from a E80 cooper load from the track through the ballast onto the bridge deck.  According to the AREMA manual the load is distributed with respect to the relitive stiffness of the members, which is great but how is it distributed thourgh the ballast to the members? It seems to me the load would reduce as some of it would be absorbed by the ballast. By the way the bridge is 3-span with the members simply supported.  Any help on this would be appreciated.

RE: Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

I am sorry not to be of much help, but it does seem to me that whether the ballast reduces the load isn't the main question to the code writers.  Rather it was how much should the longitudinal load be reduced?  Since the answer probably isn't known quite exactly an arbitrary percentage is used.  For example in highway bridges we use 5%.  Where did that come from and is it really 5% or is it more or less doesn't seem to be real important as accounting for some load in that direction.

RE: Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

(OP)
Qshake, in the AREMA manual there is no referance as to how much the longitudinal force can be reduced due to the ballast, simply that the force shall be distributed to the various members of the supporting structure.  But in order to do this the force needs to be transmitted from the rail to the ties into the ballast and finally onto the structure itself.  The formula for calculating the force at the railing is specific an takes into accout the frictional value between the rail and the train.  

In your opinion what would be a reasonable vaue to reduce the force? Since the ties are acting aganinst the passive resistance of the ballast and that transmission to the structure is probably limited by a frictional value of the ballast against the concrete would a frictional value of sliding for ballast against concrete make sense?

Any help would be appreciated

RE: Longitudinal loading on Ballasted railroad bridges

By "relative stiffness of the members" I think that they mean "relative stiffness of the substructures. i.e a tall slender pier would provide less resistance to longitudinal force than a short stubby pier.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources