×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Important Applicant Skills, revisited

(OP)
To add fuel to my previous post, I would like to toss in modern grammer, or the lack of it.  Do you judge the applicant by their command of the spoken language?  

Take a look at this:
"Me and her gone to the store."  Followed by "Me and him done this."
ARGGGHHH!
When I listen to what I think is a skilled professional and this simple comment comes out, they lose all credibility with me.  Am I alone?  I am told I am too critical, that this is the way people talk today (sorry, not me).
Choose your language of choice, I am sure it is universal.
Franz

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

I'd agree.

To me, there's a some notion that a good engineer does not stop at simply getting an answer, but also understanding of why? and what the correct answer should be.  This means that he should be using English properly.


Additionally, using English incorrecly during presentations could certainly diminish the quality and acceptability of one's presentations.

TTFN

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

hmmm, grammetical errors are not okay?  how about spelleeng?

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

There has to be some factual evidence to support the theory that spelling ability and intelligence are almost completely unrelated. (This from one with a reputation as an excellent speller.)

My high school physics teacher would base part of our lab grades on organization and penmanship.  Her point was that in our future professional lives, most of our peers' and customers' first and strongest impressions of us would be from our writing.

I haven't forgotten.  Here's to you, Mrs. Westphal.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Back in the days of typewritten reports, one very credible engine company in the UK used to have a policy of allowing NO spelling errors in reports.

Hours of fun for the typists.

Their reason was, if there's a spelling mistake in a word that indicates a lack of proofreading, admittedly corrigible by context. But what happens to a typo in a number? The final reader cannot easily check whether it should have been 1372.4 or 1327.4

Cheers

Greg Locock

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Well, grammar is definitely important.  I won't select a guy if he is poor in spoken English (read language).  Sometimes, he may end up conveying a wrong meaning to others, thereby negating all the good work he may have done.

HVAC68

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Franz--sounds like you'd like this thread:
Thread1010-104704
("writing quality" thread in the English forum)

[tangent]
I've wondered about that "me & him" construction a lot.  Why is it that people will say "me & him went" when they won't say "me went" or "him went"?  I don't really hear that much from adults; I remember getting corrected for saying it myself when I was little.  What I do hear a lot from adults, and drives me nuts, is the hypercorrection that puts "I" in object position (like "Send it to Joe or I").  Though from a linguistic standpoint even that one is fascinating, because it's a hypercorrection of the very tendency franzh talks about, and so in a way just further reinforces the reality of that particular construction.  I have just now written a linguist to ask.  I shall somehow refrain from posting my findings here.
[/tangent]

Hg

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

"Me and her gone to the store."
"Me and him done this."

Errr... this is either due to a spectacular lack of grammar skills, I would almost say a blind spot in the brain,
or a spectacular lack of interest in how a sentence is supposed to be constructed.

If this interest in how things are supposed to be constructed extends itself beyond sentences toward objects, I would be hesitant to let this person engineer my project.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

One of the keys to the engineering profession is the capability of communicating technical information so that others may make use of it.  Spelling and grammar should be considered important (in any language).  It can be difficult enough to proof your own work.  Would you want to have to go through the work of someone who either cannot or refuses to use basic grammar and syntax?  Would you hire a proof reader just to check that person's work?  Would you want them to do client presentations?

Regards,

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

In the final analysis this topic is pretty easy.  Regardless of societal "norms" of poor grammar and/or spelling, if you are in a position to hire someone you are perfectly justified in rejecting them for their lack of interest in developing language skills that you find acceptable.

If the schools don't teach these skills (and many don't) then you'll have a clear indication that an applicant is a "self starter" who can master skills in spite of the school system if they speak and write well.  

Both of my sons went through school systems that had de-emphasized grammar and spelling.  Both (finally) decided that they didn't like being grouped with the illiterate lumps of their generation and have taken steps on their own to overcome the handicap of a lousy education.  Now they both speak fairly well and can get close enough to a correct spelling for Bill Gates to guess the word they want to use.  I believe that these efforts will (and should) be rewarded in the job market.

David

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

In the U.S., foreign-born doctors are required to pass an English proficiency test to get licensed.  The test has verbal and written components.

I worked with more than a few foreign-born engineers that have an outstanding command of written English, enough to embarrass many natives.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

we went

me & him = we

me & him went

TTFN

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Ah, but me & him = us!  Us didn't went either.

Accusatives R us.  I mean, "us" is accusative.

Hg

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

It really escapes me how an engineer who is unable to properly construct a phrase that a 3-year old can say, could ever be able to design anything complicated. I wouldn't even trust him to get a coffee for me.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Some allowance may be granted for errors of spoken grammar if the interview is conducted in a language other than the applicant's native tounge.

However, poor grammer in one's native tongue is indicative of a number of things, none flattering.

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

epoisses--it's a different skill set, and really is more of a social phenomenon than a measure of intelligence.  What's seen as grammatically incorrect in the dialect of one social class is normal and rule-governed in another.

So it becomes more like choice of clothing.  Most people whose everyday speech is not that of the status group are perfectly capable of using the status dialect when they need to, especially if they're well-educated and have had plenty of contact in circles that speak the status dialect.  If they haven't picked up by the time they're on the job market that there is in fact a status form of speech (and writing), they haven't been paying attention or don't care (or are making a form of political statement).  It may not be fair that their dialect isn't the one that's considered "correct", but that's irrelevant in business.

Hg

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

You are right, spoken and written skills are very important. Specially in a technical area like Engineering. And we must admit that, as individuals high a so called higher education must stand up to the title in every way possible.

I am Portuguese and I think my English is not the worst I've seen around. A good thing is that in my country we use subtitles and very few engineering books are translated to my native tongue, so I get some advantage from it. :D

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

HgTX,

Well... yes, you made a good point there if there's a language (which I'm not familiar with, I guess) in which "me and him" is correct.

As a matter of fact (undermining my earlier post even further), I think it's equally desirable that engineers be able to not only speak "properly" but also be able to express themselves in redneck or whatever the local dialect may be, to be a credible discussion partner for any local slang speakers "out there in the plant".

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

On the subject of dialectical translation, I'm reminded of an example of 'translating' between Manager and Geek:

Manager: "The project has to be finished and ready to present by Monday, no matter what."
Translater to Geek: "We need more power to the engines, Scotty! You'll have to stay until we get it."
Geek to Translater: "Aye, Cap'n, but we need more dilithium crystals!"
Translater to Manager: "He wants overtime pay."


"Eat well, exercise regularly, die anyways."

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

epoisses--that's just it.  What's incorrect in one circle is perfectly correct in another, or they wouldn't say it.  (In other words, there is a natural language rule to govern it.)  Your comment about being able to speak redneck may undermine your earlier comment but it doesn't undermine the initial thesis of the thread--that people should be willing and able to adjust their language to fit the situation, whether it's toward or away from the standard.

Hg

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

While there is indeed a range of acceptability in different cultural circles, an applicant that is unable or unwilling to recognize that "What's up, dog?" is currently unacceptable when addressing his interviewer is in serious trouble.

TTFN

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

IRSTUFF:

That is 'sup dawg...you are showing your age dare I say....LOL

BobPE

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

I just wanted to make sure that other old fart's could understand it

TTFN

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

This thread made me think back not only to when I was fresh out of college, but all the way back to early high school.

I've always been technically inclined, and as typical with many of us, suffered from a combination of not caring about writing, and being "grammar challenged".  

It was about a year after college that I got I finally got “IT” through my thick skull;  “IT” being that the technical content of what I wrote wasn’t even read if it wasn’t written properly, with ZERO error!

I’m still not the world’s greatest writer, but even I will notice “minor” errors in reports, findings, and resumes.  These matter to me.  More importantly, they matter to my customers.  I therefore always query hiring candidates on their writing aptitude, and find an excuse to require them to provide a writing sample (one that wasn’t prepared ahead of time by someone else).

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

I could definitely see asking someone to bring an example of a report they've prepared, for example, because that would be relevant to the job they're interviewing for.  Do many interviewers do this?  I haven't heard of it, and it makes sense.

Do you really need them to do on-the-spot writing, though?  Asking for a report that THEY have prepared should be the same as asking for a design that THEY have done, and the same suspicion or lack thereof about outside help should apply.  What kind of assignments do you give?  Do they actually have to sit & write longhand?

Hg

RE: Important Applicant Skills, revisited

Hg - My previous post is evidence I'm still not always clear when I write :)

I'll ask them to provide a sample of their writing, in a day or two by email.  I will accept a previously written report as long as the candidate is the primary authore (knowing I have no way to verify this);  but I prefer they write something short but new, such as a one page (MAX) description of a project that I (as an outsider) can understand.

If I get a well written summary in a day or two, I know the candidate can write.  If I get a poorly written summary in a week or two, I don't hire.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources