×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Uplift Pressures Tank Base
2

Uplift Pressures Tank Base

Uplift Pressures Tank Base

(OP)
I know this topic in general has been discussed quite a bit, however, I was not able to find any previous discussion on the application of forces to the base slab.  I apologize if it has and I missed it.

I am reviewing some old calcs for a precast tank design to see if it is up to todays standards.  The tank is 6'-10" x 15'-8" and is comprised of stackable 2'-4" high segments.  In the course of my review I noticed that the base of the tank had been designed for the distributed bearing weight multiplied by the appropriate 1.4 load factor.  In addition to this the hydrostatic pressure was also applied but it was not multiplied by the 1.7 load factor.

Ok, here are my questions.  Is there a reason that this factor should not be applied?  Do these two loading conditions need to be applied together?  I would have thought that the maximum pressure that could be exerted on the base slab is the hydrostatic pressure from the ground water.

Any guidance would be much appreciated.  Thanks in advance.

~waytsh

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

waytsh
 Please clarify.Is the hydrostatic pressure from water in the tank or is it from the ground under the foundation? In my opinion the load factor should be applied and there are two loading conditions. Dead Load and Dead Load plus Fluid Load.

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

(OP)
fepc,

The hydrostatic pressure is from the surrounding ground water when the tank is empty.  The distributed bearing weight pressing up on the bottom of the slab is also with the tank empty.

I guess the question could be summarized as, "Is the hydrostatic ground water pressure additive to the resisting bearing pressure or does it replace the bearing pressure?"  And then of course do the full load factors apply to each?

Sorry I wasn't clear in my original question.  Hopefully I did  better this time.

Thanks,

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

waytsh,
The upward soil pressure is in place prior to the hydrostatic pressure being applied. As the water table rises the pressure on the foundation slab is increased. I would use the full load factors as indicated in ACI 318-02 p.9.2.

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

If the hydrostatic pressre is acting upward, but is less than the tank dead weight (i.e. the tank does not float) then multiplying the hydrostatic by 1.7 may have reduced the stress in the slab since the hydrostatic is acting opposite the dead weight. Thus by not multipling by 1.7 you may actually get a more conservative answer, depending on the geometry

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

(OP)
DRC1,

Wouldn't the hydro pressure be acting in the same direction as the resisting bearing force?  Or are you referring to the dead weight of the slab counteracting the hydro pressure? If this is the case then I see your point.  In this situation, however, the bottom of the base slab is 10' below ground water and the slab is only 4" thick.  So the hydrostatic pressure is significantly larger than the dead weight of the slab (even without the load factor).

RE: Uplift Pressures Tank Base

The Hydrostatic pressure acts equally in all directions. With a voided structure such as your tank which is approximately 5 ft high, the bottom of the tank would experience 312 psf (acting upward) than the top of the tank. Further since the tank is 10 feet below groundwater, the bottom slab would experience 612 psf upward pressure if the interior is empty. This acts opposite the weigt of the slab and tankk walls However slab wt is only 50 psf - so hydrostatic uplift may control design of at least the lower slab.
Any way I would multiply the net load by 1.4 or 1.7 as appropriate. Applying factors to loads acting in oppositte directions before finding the net force may lead to unintended (and incorrect) results.
Hope I have answered your question. If not let me know.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources