×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

why surfaces?
2

why surfaces?

why surfaces?

(OP)
I apoligize if this is a silly question, but I hear so much about using surfaces to design aesthetically pleasing products and I am a little confused as to why.  How is it possible to design a surface that cannot be defined as the just the boundary of a ordinarry solid.

Thank you for your responses

RE: why surfaces?

2
In order to define the boundary of the solid, it is often more convenient to work with individual surfaces. That is, entities that have zero thickness and (typically) 4 edges as a boundary. It is relatively easy to design a series of individual surface patches (parametric or freeform) to define the overall look of your model, merge them into quilts, and eventually use those quilts to define the solid (either by thickening, replacing existing solid surfaces, or forming a closed volume).

The problem with working in solid modeling all of the time is the fact that there are a series of "rules" that the model has to conform to so that Pro/E can derive the model's mass properties & such.

Since surfaces have zero thickenss, the rules which Pro/E uses to define them are a lot more forgiving. So you can achieve certain geometry in Pro/E with surfaces that would technically be impossible (or just impractical) to do using solids.

Another benefit to using surfaces is the time it takes to regenerate them. Since Pro/E does not have to update the model's mass properties after a surface feature, it takes a lot less time for a model to regenerate when compared to solid-only models. The best practice in this case is to define as much as possible in surfaces, Solidify these surfaces towards the end of the regeneration sequence, and then add any other solid features (screw bosses, holes, ribs, cuts, etc.) as needed.

Hope this helped
Mark

RE: why surfaces?

I have to admit, I have often wondered the same myself. A star for you.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources