×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Galvanizing Transfer Problem
3

Galvanizing Transfer Problem

Galvanizing Transfer Problem

(OP)
I have a process that uses a heated (cartridge heater) metal (304 SS) foot to soften HDPE and make it flow through a fine mesh expanded metal. The heater foot (.375 x .75 contact area)is stationary and the 30 ga. galvanized expanded metal is pulled under the foot, heated (400F - 600F foot temp.) and the HDPE flows after heat is transfered (radiant & conduction)to it. The galvanized expanded metal is between the heater foot and the HDPE. My problem is a buildup of Zinc on the heater foot. It eventualy builds to the point where a nib is formed and the expanded metal is torn. I am having trouble finding information about a metal that would be resistant to bonding with the Zinc. My local metal sources have suggested a grey cast iron thinking its graphite component would help but I don't think the cast iron would wear well in this pressure (approx. 10 lbf) abrasion situation. This process runs 2-3 ft./min , 8 hrs/day so longevity is an important attribute. Thanks for any assistance.

RE: Galvanizing Transfer Problem

2
Here are a couple problems.

The galvanizing may not be pure zinc but contain many low melting point elements, such as bismuth, lead and tin.  These could form other intermetallics compounds and low melting eutectics aggravating your problem.  

The intermetallic compounds can penetrate the grain boundaries of the steel (expanded metal) causing embrittlement of liquid metal assisted cracking. Examine the Carbon Equivalent in Zinc

for C<0.12%
CEZ = C+ Si/17 +Mn/7.5 + Cu/13 + Ni/17 + Cr/4.5 + Mo/3 +V/1.5 + Nb/2 + Ti/4.5 + 420B
where:
- all concentrations are in %
- valid for c<0.12%
- for B>0.0004% use a value of 0.004

If CEZ < 0.44% zinc assisted cracking will probally not be a problem.


For C>0.12% (medium Carbon Steels)
Slm400 = 227 - 320C - 10Si -76 Mn -50Cu - 30 Ni - 92Cr - 88Mo - 200V -220Nb +200Ti

If Slm400 > 0.42 cracking should not be a problem.

(Based on research by the Tomoe Corpoartion, Japan)

Watch for cracking of the 304 SS heater.  Austentic stainless cracks in the present of zinc (solid metal embrittlement).

Why not use 304 stailess steel expanded metal?

RE: Galvanizing Transfer Problem

You either need to get rid of the galvanizing, or change alloy for the foot.  Why not Cr plated steel?  or electroless Ni (Ni-P) plated?
Is wear an issue?  Either of these platings will be a lot harder than the stainless.
I can think of other options, but they are more exotic.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Corrosion never sleeps, but it can be managed.
http://www.trenttube.com/Trent/tech_form.htm

RE: Galvanizing Transfer Problem

(OP)
Rich2001 and EdStainless, Thank for the help. This information gives me a couple of educated directions to explore.
This site and forum are a wonderful example of the best aspects of the internet and of human nature.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources