Boss Problems
Boss Problems
(OP)
I'm a mechanical engineer who has worked in the electronics industry for 20yrs doing electromechanical packaging design. The problem I have is that my boss (who is an EE) thinks he can do my job and tends to minimize and oversimplify what I do. I bring much to the table (e.g. heat transfer analysis, CAD design, stress analysis, drafting skills, specmanship, shock/vibration analysis, industry standards and practices,...) however, in my last performance review, much of the time-consuming, day-to-day stuff that I do was ignored as he concentrated only on what was on his and his boss' "radar screen."
How can I impress on him that he is not qualified to do my job (let alone qualified to judge me!) and that he has much to learn about what me and my peers do for the industry? One constant I have noticed in my career is that many EEs seem to think that they are intellectually superior to the MEs!
How can I impress on him that he is not qualified to do my job (let alone qualified to judge me!) and that he has much to learn about what me and my peers do for the industry? One constant I have noticed in my career is that many EEs seem to think that they are intellectually superior to the MEs!
Tunalover





RE: Boss Problems
http://www.EsoxRepublic.com
RE: Boss Problems
Also, the nice thing about being "the boss" is that you do not have to do the work, just make sure that it gets done.
RE: Boss Problems
Not sure if you're AKA means that you love fishing for Tuna or that you have an strange fetish, but hope that it's the former.
Even though I am in a managerial position, I have a similar problem to those which you describe after much effort and frustration, I've resigned myself to the fact that it's probably best to move on, even thoug I really enjoy what I do.
I hope you understand that I am not suggesting you should do the same, just wanted to point out that sometimes there's absolutely nothing you can do to change the thinking of your superiors.
Regards,
GGOSS
RE: Boss Problems
Does your boss have the same attitude towards your co-workers, or just with you? If it's just you, then it's possibly a personality clash, if it's everybody that works for him then it's most likely his personality.
Either way, I would generally tend to support what GGOSS says, in that you are unlikely to be able to change this, although you have slightly more of a chance if it's just you!
However, even if you can't change the situation, you may be able to manage it. In my opinion, it's just as (if not more) important to manage the people above you in an organisation as it is those reporting to you!
Firstly, understand what he wants. You MUST do this in a non-confrontational way, and when you are both reasonably relaxed. Go into his office, and ask him if you can have a word, and if you mind if you close the door. That will get his attention - guaranteed. Then calmly walk to a seat and sit down. Then tell him that there are some issues that he raised in your development review that you've been thinking about, and you'd like to discuss further.
If he's saying to you that you're not doing what he and his boss consider are important, then that may be a valid point. Try to elicit what exactly it is he does want. What areas would he prefer you to concentrate on? And, just as importantly, are there any things that you do, that he thinks you're wasting your time on? If he doesn't think that something you do is important, but really it is, tell him why you think it's important. Don't get into an argument though. Try something like - "Well I'll certainly try that, but if I don't do it, it might mean that something else will suffer".
Ask him what else would he like to see change about the way you work. Maybe he thinks you would benefit from a time management course, etc.? If so, give him the opportunity to say so, and try to respond positively to any suggestions.
Finally, after this give yourselves both some time to think things over, and come back with any other ideas. The onus is on you to make sure you follow this up regularly. Has he seen any improvement in the way you work as far as he is concerned? Is there anything else he'd like you to do?
If this doesn't work, or you are unwilling to adopt this approach to help to improve the situation, then you have 2 options - either put up with it or move. If you decide to move, it's often a good idea to look internally first.
One approach might be to tell your boss that you need some broader experience within the company, and can he find out if you could be seconded to a project within a different team.
Hope some of this helps. Let us know how you get on.
RE: Boss Problems
However, you will find that many managers are not qualified to evaluate you, technically. This is a way of life in the engineering field. I have worked for EE's and agricultural engineers (never knew this was a disciipline). Of course, I liked working for a boss that was an EE because he did show some favoritism. Now, the tables have turned and I work for a Civil (heaven help me-another joke).
If this issue is really discipline related, I suggest you find another job as this one will lead no where. If the boss just does not think your valuable, lay your calculations/simulations in front of him and ask him to review them for you. Just casually pass it off as you wanting is 'expert' opinion. Once he realizes you really are doing engineering work maybe his eyes will open. Maybe they won't.
I think it is safe to say that mechanicals working for an electrical company may have a disadvantage. Also, an electrical working for a company geared more towards mechanical things may also have a disadvantage. I mean there bread and butter is electrical work not mechanical. It is just one of those things you have to deal with. Good luck.
RE: Boss Problems
I would expect that the Tick really does know more MEs adept at EE work because HE WORKS MORE WITH ME's. I mean come on, if we really want to go their we can.
RE: Boss Problems
Tunalover says that "The problem I have is that my boss (who is an EE) thinks he can do my job and tends to minimize and oversimplify what I do".
The funny thing is that in the next reply theTick says, " know more ME's adept at EE than vice-versa..."
... to reply to the theTick: are the ME's really more adept? or do you just think they can do the job of an EE and you might be minimizing and oversimplifying what an EE really does??
RE: Boss Problems
Tunalover
RE: Boss Problems
Funny thing about that outfit; they made blood cell counters, which typically have hugely complex fluid systems and very complex mechanical systems. I.e., most of the hard problems were in mechanical design. They kept hiring EEs to solve mechanical problems, and they never did figure out why the products were legendary for their unreliability.
Actual customer comment: "I love my xxx brand machines because the serviceman is always here. I'm not going to buy any more of them, though, because ... the serviceman is always here."
Mike Halloran
NOT speaking for
DeAngelo Marine Exhaust Inc.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
RE: Boss Problems
RE: Boss Problems
I heard an interesting example of this about 10 years ago at an ASME meeting. The guest speaker was a ME who worked for the Disney Corporation. His talk described (1) the new (at the time) race-car ride (I forget its name) & a few engineering challenges; and (2) how new rides are created.
In talking about how rides were created, he mentioned the Disney food chain - "artists" (the creative types) are at the top, and engineers were near the bottom. The "artists" dreamed up an idea, and the engineers found a way to make it happen.
This seemed a good example where I doubt very much that an engineer could ever be recognized on a level with the "artists"; but if enjoy the work you get over this aspect.
RE: Boss Problems
Hoo, boy, with that attitude, you're lucky to be employed! Of COURSE he's qualified to judge you. He's the boss. If he doesn't know what you are doing, it's because you haven't told him. I used to hate the annual performance reviews, then I started taking notes all year long of what I'm doing, and MOST IMPORTANTLY what the results are. Now my performance reviews show exactly what I do and how well I do it. My boss knows exactly what I do, and again MOST IMPORTANTLY what the results were. Effort doesn't matter. Clever engineering doesn't matter. Results matter.
RE: Boss Problems
So as to be able to answer questions about what I've been doing, I also take notes. For each and every project, I keep a Notepad file, describing what was said and what was done. Notepad provides a useful way to record 'when'; just hit F5, and you get a time/date stamp.
Mike Halloran
NOT speaking for
DeAngelo Marine Exhaust Inc.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
RE: Boss Problems
Cheers
APH
RE: Boss Problems
So you believe that my bosses is qualified to judge me simply because he's my boss. What planet are you from? Are you in education or management by any chance?
Tunalover
RE: Boss Problems
I know what you mean though, I have had bosses whose opinion was frankly irrelevant.
Cheers
Greg Locock
RE: Boss Problems
This may or may not be fair; the boss may or may not be competent; but this is part of what HIS responsibilities are. It matters not what his education is, or experience. If he is the boss, then he not only has the authority to judge you, he has the responsibility to judge you.
Similarly, the boss is judged by HIS BOSS, and so on.
This system may not be perfect, but as the saying goes, until a better system is proposed AND enacted, it IS the system we have. Either accept it, or forever be unhappy.
RE: Boss Problems
Imagine your company as a dog....your boss is a flea on the body of the dog (management).....you are the tail(labor).....As we know life on this planet, the dog wags the tail(management runs labor)...your boss is getting a different view of the dog than you are, even though you are on the same dog....now when the tail can wag the dog(labor runs management)...do we really need the dog(company) at that point?
I have never worked for a non-engineer manager before, and never will...I have quit positions becuase of this conflict...so in my warped way of looking at it, you can say I jumped off one dogs tail and onto anothers body....and if I end up back on the tail again, I will find yet another dog....
BobPE
RE: Boss Problems
A Boss has to understand the technical ins and outs. He also has to have aclear vision of where he wants the project to go (beyond simply showing a 20% margin) how he wants to get there and what your part in the process is. He also has to not only clearly communicate this plan, but make sure it is going where he wants it to go. This is leadership (a bosses job) anythigh else is just pionting and hoping the project gets there. (This is what a "boss" does if he doesn't understand the process).
A person is supervisor by appointment. A person is a boss by his (or her) ability to lead.
RE: Boss Problems
Likewise, oil companies in the early 70's went the same route when they diversified and bought a bunch of semiconductor companies. Schlumberger lost over $7B, after paying around $1B for FSC. It was eventually sold to National Semi for about $120M, cash.
While you might think this would be sufficient proof, managment thinks that it's simply poor execution and that a "good" manager can overcome total ignorance of his group's functions.
TTFN
RE: Boss Problems
What the non-tech boss can't evaluate directly is the specialist's level of knowledge and how well they apply that knowledge. But they'll know if the specialist is screwing up. They'll know if the specialist is able to provide usable answers to the questions said specialist was hired to answer. They'll know if the specialist is meeting deadlines, fulfilling tasks, etc. They are qualified to judge whether the specialist is a good employee, performing a valuable service for the company.
But tunalover is right in that the boss is likely not qualified to do the specialist's job, and if the boss thinks he is, there's a problem.
If you can step back from the criticism, revisit this part of TrainerBob's post:
The only thing I'd change is don't wait till the end-of-year performance review to touch base with the boss. Make sure he understands pretty much all the time what you're up to.
Hg
RE: Boss Problems
I think that the problem that tunalover is facing is more a management style issue than one of an interdiscipline communication gap. Based upon his description, I'd estimate that the problem is 75% management style and 25% interdiscipline gap.
RE: Boss Problems
You all can call it sucking up or brown nosing, but if you don't tell your boss how valuable you are to him, no one else will.
RE: Boss Problems
Find out what his goals are and how he is judged by his boss and then align your efforts to help your boss acheive his goals. This, in turn, will keep him happy and he will begin to value your work because it gets him what he wants.
If you want to win the game, you have to know the rules - so figure out what the rules are!
Your other option, of course, is to seek your fortune elsewhere.
Good Luck.
RE: Boss Problems
I just wanted to join into the griping session. I am also a mechanical engineer doing electromechanical packaging for the defense industry. In my ten years of work, I had some different bosses. In my last company my boss was a mechanical and his boss was a mechanical and so forth. It was great! The design revolved around the mechanical geometry. We had to put stuff in tight places where heat transfer and vibrations were already defined by us. In other words, the electronic engineers had to do their magic under our specifications. At my present company it is the opposite, my boss is a mechanical, but his boss is an electrical. At this place the electricals reign. The electricals think that they can pump more power thru their ICs and expect us to take the heat away at high temps or have a circuit board lay out that is sensitive to vibration and shock. The electricals design may be working in a lab environment, but once you put it in military application with high heat and violent vibrations and fail, who’s your daddy now?
Go Mechanical Engineering
Tobalcane
RE: Boss Problems
Amen to that!
APH
RE: Boss Problems
But on a serious note, I have had numerous occasions where prior coordination with the mechanical/systems people has saved me from a very stupid mistake that would have had serious cost/schedule implications if I just "ASSUMED" that temperature/vibration/shock/fluid intrustion issues would magically sort themselves out.
So to all the mechanical/systems people who have saved my a** throughout the years, THANK YOU and I am sure glad I asked...to all my electrical compadres, prior coordination is a wise thing to do. And make sure and listen. I have never had an engineer from another discipline bring up possible problems with my design just for the purpose of irritating me.
Craig
RE: Boss Problems
Go Mechanical Engineering
Tobalcane
RE: Boss Problems
RE: Boss Problems
So-called "managers" who are doing engineering are NOT managers, but engineers.
A senior engineer, e.g., me, does not expect my manager to know more about my job than I. I expect my manager to be concerned about results, accuracy and timeliness and not the nitty-gritties of how I get the answers. My manager MIGHT know more about certain technical aspects of my job, based on his experience, but I expect him the grade me based on me and not based on his own expertise.
TTFN
RE: Boss Problems
I think we would all agree that ME's and EE's are equally important. You can't have one without the other in the cases you have presented. Deal with this and let your ego dwindle down a bit.