×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

(OP)

I have a 15 foot long, 6 foot ID vessel. Initially the saddles were symmetrically placed at D/4 from right and left tangent lines. Latter due to nozzle interference issue, I moved right saddle in by 1 foot thus reducing saddle to saddle separation by 1 foot. The left saddle was not moved. Is this ok? Compress calculations are showing all the stresses way below the allowables. I want to know if this is done often? Is unsymmetrical saddle placement ok? Please comment and tell this newbie if the decision he made was a wise one?

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

There is nothing wrong with unsymmetric saddle placement; however, the load distribution is no longer 50/50,  So, you must somehow fool the design program into increasing the saddle LOAD to account for this.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

Compress will automatically design for the saddle with the higher loading. I generally try to avoid unsymetrical saddles. If there are no obstructions on the other side you could still make it symetrical i.e. 2.5-10-2.5 ft. This is still within the guideline of 0.2L (3.0 ft) max from tanline to saddle.

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

(OP)
well, the vessel has a boot which is closer to right saddle, thus actually moving the right saddle by 1 foot as I said earlier, I think has evened the load out between the two saddles. Would you agree? The boot is about 4700 lb out of 27627 lb operating weight (new) for the vessel. Does compress consider the boot location when it distributes load between the two saddles?

It appears that Zick method which is very conservative is still used in the industry. Compress also used Zick method. I keep hearing that FEM has proved that Zick method is too conservative, but is any one using FEM for saddle design? Are people using minimum saddle dimensions based on FEM analysis? I guess saddle dimensions suggested by FEM must be way lower than those given by Zick. Please direct me to some reading about this topic.

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

(OP)
codeeng,

where is the guideline of 0.2L ?

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

Team Member  and altoid3000 (Mechanical)

RE: Reference check after CODEWARE COMPRESS analysis use SADDLE PRO by Paulin Reseach Group  http://www.paulin.com

Leonard Thill
www.thill.biz

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

altoid3000
The 0.2L max guideline comes from our company standard. Its also mentioned in PV Design Manual by Moss. Compress should take into account the boot weight on the saddle. I use Zick for most designs and FEA when justified. Skimping on saddle design is generally not worth the extra effort.

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

(OP)
I agree that using FEM for every saddle design is not the right way to go, but my point is why have the industry standards not changed based FEM studies. Why is Zick method still the only thing available when it comes to saddle placement decision?

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

Altoid,
Zick provided a solution to this problem many years ago and it takes a lot to move folks away from a solution that is proven to work.  FEM just adds a lot of technical activity to an already solved problem.  I find it difficult to justify the expense of an FEM solution that ends up with esentially the same result.  Also, using advanced analytical technics usually ends up with reducing materials and details to the point that the robustness of the final design is gone... no margin for the practical problems of owning the vessel... corrosion, unanticpated settlement, piping loads, etc.  Bottom line... put the owner's money in the vessel, not the analysis.

Steve Braune
Tank Industry Consultants
www.tankindustry.com

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

Much less of a problem to reroute the piping to a nozzle than make unsymmetrical saddles IMO.

Brian

RE: UNSYMMETRICAL SADDLES

FEM COSTLY, ZICK ANALYSIS CHEAP.EXTRA MEAT PUT ON BY ZICK ANALYSIS IS CHEAPER THAN FEM.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources