×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

(OP)
I am in the process of evaluating storm sewer drainage designs for small area urban basins with no detention(typically less than 10 acres and subdivided into basins of less than 0.5 acres in some instances). Is the SCS method still applicable for this type of analysis? Or should I say which would be more applicable, the SCS method or the Rational method. (understanding that the SCS is based on a 24 hour storm with a peak and that the rational method is a one hour constant rate)

When comparing results from both SCS (TR-55)method and the Rational method the results are quite different.  I.E. for a 0.46 acre area that is 87% impervious the SCS 25 yr storm using a minimum Tc of 0.1 hrs, resulted in a developed flowrate of 0.8cfs, while the rational method using a minimum Tc of 5min (i=4.3) resulted in a flowrate of 1.7cfs.

After summing all the small basins obviously the differences become greater and ultimately drives different storm sewer and inlet sizes.

Does anyone recommend one over the other? Is SCS more accurate and the Rational just more conservative even on these smaller basins? Or is the rational more accurate and the SCS underestimate the flowrats?




Realizing the Rational method is not generally valis for large areas, say  

RE: Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

For subcatchments to storm conveyance, I always use rational.  It is the peak you want, and rational will give you a more conservative peak.  For areas under one acre (and definitely for those under 0.5 acres), I also use rational, and most Ordinances here in PA, USA require this.

SCS is generally accepted to produce a better hydrograph for sizing and routing detention facilities.

RE: Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

Like lha says,

You can use Rational for conveyance design (gives you bigger pipes & less flooding potential) and hydrograph method (SCS, SBUH) for detention design.  Rational is better at estimating peak flows from intense downpours, with no flood routing for flow to the collection point. Hydrographs are better for estimating runoff volumes, and typically use a routing coefficient that is based on basin characteristics to estimate flood routing attentuation.  Pond sizing depends on accurate assessment of runoff volume, otherwise the pond may be too small.  

Calibration of Rational method to yield runoff volumes for specific storms is sometimes undertaken by local agencies to simplify analyses and design, but the specific approach to be used depends on local climate conditions, eg. relationship of peak rainfall intensity to storm volumes.  Using rational method for pond sizing is more common where large intense storms (e.g. thunderstorms) drive the detention design, as opposed to a more drizzly climate where longer duration, lower intensity storms drive the design.

RE: Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

using rational to size ponds is not allowed in most areas

RE: Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

Calibration of Rational method to yield runoff volumes for specific storms is sometimes undertaken by local agencies to simplify analyses and design, but the specific approach to be used depends on local climate conditions, eg. relationship of peak rainfall intensity to storm volumes.  Using rational method for pond sizing is more common where large intense storms (e.g. thunderstorms) drive the detention design, as opposed to a more drizzly climate where longer duration, lower intensity storms drive the design.

Can you elaborate on this calibration procedure to yield runoff volume?

RE: Rational Vs SCS for small urban detentionless Basins

The calibration procedure would consist of monitoring the runoff generated in a catchment of known characteristics for a known storm.  

Using a "rational" approach to computing runoff volumes was the method adopted here in King County WA in 1979, but has since been superseded by Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph, then an HSPF based method, because single event methods are not adequate for addressing multi-day storm events.  

I have not used the old method that the County had codified, but I've done a lot of water quality modeling where loading coefficients were applied.  Scheuler's Simple Method is an example of this approach; see the Center for Watershed Protection website for details of the Simple Method.  www.cwp.org

A summary of a method to find a C factor for runoff volume would be as follows:  If you know the rainfall record for the storm you can compute the total storm volume, Pr (inches), for the catchment area (A) that is monitored.  By measuring runoff rates (with a flow gauge/meter) over the course of the storm you can compute the total runoff volume, which can be expressed as average depth (inches) over the catchment, Qd.  Then you can solve for loading factor C such that Qd = Pr * A * C .  The challenge is that C varies depending on the size/intensity of the storm and the antecedent moisture conditions. Curve number methods use an initial abstraction computation that takes into account some of these factors, so CNs don't vary with storm size as a C-loading factor computed in this fashion would.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources