Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Here's a part I'm having problems with.
(OP)
It is a vacuum-formed tray to hold cylinderical shaped components.
It's got a lot of geometry, but it is simple drafted diameters, and ribs that have been linear patterned "X" number of times. I created the "inside" shape first, which the toolmaker can roll back to and have the mold itself, then shell it outward to get the "backside". Removing the fillets doesn't help a lot in this case.
I have gone thru all of the "slow performance" threads, checked all of system properties to Solidworks recomendations, checked and tweaked my settings, etc... I still wait for 45 minutes each time I make a minor change to the file for it to rebuild.
If anyone sees a way to create this part while keeping the file size managable, I'd really appreciate it.
{img}htt p://groups .msn.com/_ Secure/0SA AZA5oVLhPk Lkl1fAqL5P*qwui8K1pK4BKAOL2orNk4SmU26SNDbSX7KiJ!JDk2hVuBJN!c*E7XUy3fLNvJZYtteXLXKKeOriWEfp1UfoMzAAAAynKNAg/tray2.jpg?dc=4675498849472058532{img}
It's got a lot of geometry, but it is simple drafted diameters, and ribs that have been linear patterned "X" number of times. I created the "inside" shape first, which the toolmaker can roll back to and have the mold itself, then shell it outward to get the "backside". Removing the fillets doesn't help a lot in this case.
I have gone thru all of the "slow performance" threads, checked all of system properties to Solidworks recomendations, checked and tweaked my settings, etc... I still wait for 45 minutes each time I make a minor change to the file for it to rebuild.
If anyone sees a way to create this part while keeping the file size managable, I'd really appreciate it.
{img}htt






RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
h
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Can we get a image of the Feature Tree for this model.
"But what... is it good for?"
Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Thanks
h
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
The revolved features are the two main cylinder shapes. I've tried them as "stacked" extruded features also, but the results were the same... slow.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Couple suggestions (maybe you've tried these)
1.) Try using geometry pattern, this can sometimes speed things up (or slow them down).
2.) If you have a bunch of changes to do, try suppressing the patterns, making your changes, and resuming them.
Also, what are your computer specs? I wouldn't recommend anything less than a P4 3GHz or Athlon 3000 with at least 1GB or RAM.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Operating System & Service Pack: WinXP SP2.0
Graphics Card and Driver version: Nvidia Quadro FX1000
Driver version 6.14.0010.5303
Amount of installed RAM: 20GB
Virtual Memory settings: Minumum 2mb Maximum 4096mb
CPU Type & Speed: Xeon 3.2Ghz
Assembly Statistics:
Recent changes to system: none
Recent changes to file/document: trying to edit sketch of patterned feature
Does problem exist on other computers: no… I’m only one running solidworks
Does problem exist with other files: yes.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Mike Elias
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
"But what... is it good for?"
Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
Have you read FAQ731-376 to make the best use of Eng-Tips Forums?
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I have tried that. I created a sketch that made one row, extruded the features, then patterned it in only one direction. That seemed to shrink the file, but I lost some adjustability with the spacing. I might just have to make that sacrifice though.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Hardware Dell M50 laptop, 1.8GHz 1Gb RAM
Full regeneration time 3 minutes.
I know that this doesn't help your cause, and I'm likely to get some people doubting this result.
Can anyone suggest a method of validating these findings, i.e. does anyone have SW & WF and a few minutes available to model this part?
Why is WF so much quicker at regenerating (rebuilding) features than SW in this type of model?
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I appreciate the effort. Did you rebuild it after making a change to a feature? or just "redraw" or "refresh" it?
Try changing the spacing in each direction and see what it takes to rebuilt it. Also, did you use a "shell" feature? (not sure if Pro-E has the same terminology)
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I do have a couple of fillets (rounds) before the shell which seem to be on your model, one round the outside of the plate, and a complex loop round the outside of the cylindrical bosses and ribs.
I could post a picture of the model, but am waiting for an account on the groups.msn.com site.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I supressed everything from the shell down, changed something, then rebuilt, and it took less than a minute each time. Then I unsupressed the shell feature, and waited... and waited... I opened task manager, and it's at 100% CPU usage, then as the PF usage goes up, it maxes out at 2.8GB (I have the 3GB switch done)...
I waited 20 minutes, and gave up.
I'm thinking about adding a hard drive and putting my virtual mamory there... I'm officially putting in a enhancement request for more efficient handling of the shell feature to SW.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
How much memory do you use up when you make the change? Have you watched your Task manager? I'm testing your file right now. I only have 1 gig and I have exceeded that. I was all the way up to 1.64 Gig over.
It finally went down and return the model to me after about 15 minutes. The shell failed. Note: If you get and error, that will increase your amount of time when it's rebuilding. So since the shell failed I'm goign to blame that slow rebuild on that process. I changed the base feature from 774 to 780.
I'm changing it back. As soon as I get a result I'll let you know.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP
3DVision Technologies
http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
FAQ559-716 - SW Fora Users
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I'm not sure what you're asking as far as "How much memory do you use up when you make the change? Have you watched your Task manager?"
I noted what my task manager was saying in the reply above.
Thanks for all of your effort Scott.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
I guess the actual geometry could be making the shell difficult, is it possible for you to give some dimensions so we're comparing like for like?
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
The problem is the Shell. If I open up your file and do a Crtl-Q on it. The Sheel will fail. I don't have change anything. The reason your time line is soo long is because the Sheel fails and SW tries several times to make it work. The only way to stop the rebuild is to click the "Esc" key. You need to find the area of what feature that causing the shell to fail.
Here is the Error or What's wrong:
"The shell operation failed to complete. One of the faces may offset into an adjacent face, a small face may need to be eliminated, or one of the faces may have a radius of curvature which is smaller than the shell thickness. Please use Tools Check to find the minimum radius of curvature on appropriate faces. If possible, eliminate any unintended small faces or edges."
I hope this helps you out... not that I found a solid answer, but at least you have a new starting point.
Also check out the Tools\"Feature Statistics" - This will tell you where your big time % is at.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP
3DVision Technologies
http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
FAQ559-716 - SW Fora Users
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
But at least it only took 40 seconds, and then also offers advice where the problem is etc.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP
3DVision Technologies
http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
FAQ559-716 - SW Fora Users
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
"Highlighted surfaces are too curved to offset by specified value.
Make a quilt from good surfaces, offset the quilt,
make patches over missing surfaces."
Regards,
RocketRonnie
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
on other shelled parts, I've shelled it, had it fail, then found where the problems were. Ussually involves small faces, or small radii, or small areas that are to small for the shell thickness. This is just part of my design process.
I don't mind it failing, just can't wait that long.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
- - -Dennyd
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
In the past with experiencing long rebuilds, I have stopped using the shell command. I know this can be quite labouriuos in generating the part using just patterned cuts and bosses but can be much quicker once done for rebuilds and modifiying.
When think about it solidworks has to go back and check every feature that is created by the shell. And any changes you make to the driving feature.
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
That would be a way to test it and cut it at the same time. Then you pattern it.
Regards,
Scott Baugh, CSWP
3DVision Technologies
http://www.3dvisiontech.com
http://www.scottjbaugh.com
FAQ731-376
FAQ559-716 - SW Fora Users
RE: Here's a part I'm having problems with.
When I get a chance, i'm going to try a couple of these ideas. I'm working on 10 different other projects now, so it'll be a while till I get a chance.