×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

ENR Article on Insurance Threat

ENR Article on Insurance Threat

ENR Article on Insurance Threat

(OP)
Have any of you read the recent article in ENR November 15, 2004? It is titled "Structural Engineers Join to Tackle Insurance Threat".

The frequency of claims is about double for structurals vs. other engineers. Last year, the average cost per firm for defense and indemnity of paid claims about $230k was almost 30% higher than other engineers.

Since we are such a small part of the insurance business, there may be a future time where we may not be able to buy insurance. I understand CASE has a committee working with the insurance industry to try to address this issue. Some suggestions are better aggressive internal and external management, limitation of liability in contracts, larger fees and self regulation of the profession.

Any thoughts?

RE: ENR Article on Insurance Threat

My first thought would be, is this situation any different from years past?  The article may make that plain, but your post doesn't.  It would certainly be natural that people that designed expensive things would incur more liability than people that didn't, so I don't know that the comparison across different types of engineers really means much.  Kind of like comparing insurance between, say, a brain surgeon and an allergist.

RE: ENR Article on Insurance Threat

I just read the article.  I think it's just indicative of how litigious our society has become.  I would be interested to know what percentage of claims against structurals were actually legitimate.  I suspect the lawyers just sue everybody in sight and hope to get the maximum judgement possible.  I would also be interested to know how many suits are filed by the structural firm's clients versus outside parties (i.e. the contractor).  At this point, I think our only recourse is limited liability clauses and increased fees to pay for the insurance, although I'm not sure a limited liability clause will hold up in court these days.  Maybe the structural engineer of the future will be single, drives a 10-year old car, has no liability insurance, and lives in an apartment.  That way, it's not worth sueing the poor slob.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources