×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Timber Deck Rating

Timber Deck Rating

Timber Deck Rating

(OP)
I am in the process of doing an AASHTO live load rating on a small timber bridge (timber stringers and timber decking) and have a question regarding the deck rating portion. The deck is comprised of two layers of 2 1/2" thick timbers. The bottom layer runs perpendicular to the stringers and the top layer runs at 45 degrees to the bottom layer. It's my assumption that only the bottom layer of timbers was intended to be the "deck" and the top layer was intended to be a wearing surface of sorts and thus I was not intending to count on that as addition structural capacity but can't find anything in AASHTO or elsewhere to confirm or deny my assumptions. Anyone else ever run into something similar?

Thanks
Corey

RE: Timber Deck Rating

Corey,
Your assumption that only the bottom layer is structural is reasonable, according to my very old book on the subject. The reason for 45 degree skew for the top planks is to minimize wear, as such configuration is more durable than the one with planks parallel or perpendicular to the axis of the bridge.
For the top layer, assume some reasonable wear (say .5"), and use this layer to distribute the wheel load to the bottom planks. Typically, 1:1 ratio is being used for the distribution of the wheel load, but that's very conservative, and 1:1.5 could be more appropriate.
The distribution could be even higher, if the deck's planks were nailed together.

RE: Timber Deck Rating

The U.S.D.A Forest Service publication "Timber Bridges Design, Construction, Inspection, and Maintenance" seems to verify your assumption.  There is a design example for a transverse timber plank deck (4x12) with a 2" timber wearing surface.  It gives no structural contribution from the wearing surface.  (Example 7-13, page 7-138)

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources