×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Debunking the Control Architectures

Debunking the Control Architectures

Debunking the Control Architectures

(OP)
Can anyone point me to a good reference that describes and debunks the various architectures currently in use for control systems. In particular, I am interesting in learning more about the following:

1. Analog (4-20ma) and Discrete IO versus
2. ModBus TCP/IP versus
3. Profibus, versus
4. Foundation Fieldbus (H1 and HSE)

I believe that an overview comparing each, pros/cons, etc. would be of great benefit to more than just myself.

I have visited modbus.org and frankly, the information there is too detailed. FF does a better job of describing itself.

Thanks for any help.

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

RGcook
Stop at:  http://www.easydeltav.com/aboutdeltav/index.asp
and read few lines about the Fisher-Rosemount Delta-V system.
Then you can go to:
http://www.easydeltav.com/video/product/index.asp
and watch some videos online (each about 5 min.)
Think it will give you some idea.  
You can also stop at  www.smar.com and look for the systems explained there.
Think the easyest way is to contact the agent of one of those companies and ask them to try and convince you to buy thier product after explaining it.

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

Definitions of debunk on the Web:

expose while ridiculing; especially of pretentious or false claims and ideas; "The physicist debunked the psychic's claims"

Do you really mean "debunks" ?

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

(OP)
What I mean is...why so many architectures and "open" standards. I didn't even mention DeviceNet or others that I am not even aware of.

Perhaps Debunk is a harsh word. But I am really trying to understand which ones merit investigation and which ones are just "piling on".

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

A few years ago, when a fieldbus standard was in the planning, no one could agree on one standard, so the committee decided to make several standards.  That didn't go over well with the head of the committe and he quit (I think that was the story).  I think 7 standards came out of that committee.  I quess everyone agreed to disagree.

Be careful of what you see at www.easydeltav.com.

I have installed several instrumentation networks (on DeltaV too), and it is NOT that easy.  Their claims, just like any salesrep's, are not as they seem.

For example, they claim that commissioning one instrument is reduced from 1 hour to a few minutes (15 I think in their propaganda).  Complete rubbish!  Same goes for thier claim to reduce Engineering time.  Garbage.

If you decide to install an instrumentation system at a plant, be sure that the plant has the personnel to maintain it.  It is much more difficult than a standard 4-20mA system to troubleshoot for many maintenance personnel.  Even with training.  But it is nice to have reduced cabinet space and less wiring(if done correctly).

After installing several networks, I still recommend standard HART for most plants.  

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

Controlnovice is correct that commissioning is not necessarily as optimistic as suggested by marketing information.  However, with HART the AMS software on a notebook PC is very helpful.  I bet that it is helpful with Foundation Fieldbus tm too.

John

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

(OP)
Thanks for your helpful response guys. An EI&C friend recently told me to stick with HART as well. We did put three Micromotion coriolis on Modbus in the last plant but I think we will hold the line and see how it goes.

Appreciate the input.

Bob

RE: Debunking the Control Architectures

Yes.  AMS is very useful for HART instruments.  And AMS is very useful for Foundation Fieldbus instruments as well.  It is definately better than standing with a 275 HART communicator in the field commissioning instruments in Northern Canada during winter, or Houston in August.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources