×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

51G protection

51G protection

51G protection

(OP)
Hello,

I am working in a facility trying to refurbish a fan/motor control center.  I noticed that regardless of the load(50A,150A,225A,400A) the ct selected has been 200:5A for the 51G protection for each feeder.  I was told this is standard practice.  

What are the pit-falls in doing so (if any)?  My concern is the ct primary being smaller than the FLC for the application.

Regards,
TULUM

RE: 51G protection

I assume the CT goes around all three phases - a flux summation or zero sequence CT.

The load current is not really an issue, since the CT will only see the imbalanced current resulting from a line-to-ground fault.  

The CT ratio depends on several factors including the type of system grounding (solid or resistance) and the type of relay being used.  

In most cases, there is nothing downstream of this relay to coordinate with, so the ground relay can be quite sensitive.  In fact, many people use a 50G relay - instantaneous trip with 50/5 zero sequence CT.

One concern can be saturation of a low ratio CT on solidly-grounded system.  If you are trying to selectively coordinate with something downstream this could be an issue.  When an instantaneous relay is used, the thinking is that the relay will still operate even if the CT saturates.  

RE: 51G protection

The NEC says that for feeders 800A and above need GFP. It does not require it be designed well.

RE: 51G protection

(OP)
Thanks folks.

Impedance grounded.. and end of line (no downstream protection to coordinate with)

I think I need to "edumacate" myself a bit more on the subject.

As always, insightful and appreciated.

TULUM


RE: 51G protection

tulum,

With low impedance grounding, the 200:5 CT should be no problem - the only problem might making sure you have enough ground fault current to detect and relay reliably.  

If it's high impedance grounding, the fault current will probably be too low for this setup to work reliably.  

RE: 51G protection

(OP)
Dpc,

Thanks again.  The NGR is a 10A, 347V resistor (on the secondary of a 1500kva 4160v-600v dy transformer)

Regards,
TULUM

RE: 51G protection

 
One paper on the subject is: John P. Nelson, Pankaj K. Sen, High-Resistance Grounding of Low-Voltage Systems: A Standard for the Petroleum and Chemical Industry, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, VOL. 35, NO. 4, JULY/AUGUST 1999 at www.neiengineering.com/papers/paper1JN.pdf
  

RE: 51G protection

Well, on 10A of ground fault current, the 200/5 CT would only be putting out .25A of secondary current.  You will probably need some other method for detecting ground faults, such as a zero sequence voltage detection scheme.

Is the resistor rated for 10A continuously?   

RE: 51G protection

(OP)
DPC,

The resistor is continuosly rated.  The protective device is a startco SE-105 (on feeders) and an se-325 on the NGR itself.  I wish I could add more... I installed and worked on many of these, but I am not to familiar with the engineering behind them.

I understand the basics behind the zero sequence current ct (this is what the feeder ct's are), but what is a zero sequence voltage detection scheme?

Regards,
TULUM

RE: 51G protection

 
A limitation of zero-sequence overcurrent in low-voltage, high-resistance-grounded systems is that it can be hard to coordinate with various levels of overcurrent protection—given the comparatively low currents during faults.  Negative-sequence voltage, instead of a CT in the grounding-resistor lead, typcially uses a ø-ø rated VT in parallel with the resistor.  

The VT serves a low-pickup, high-continuous-withstand voltage relay, often restrained for third-harmonic voltage.  However sensitive, it is more of a non-directional “all-or-none” method of fault detection or indication.
   

RE: 51G protection

Busbar - 59N and 59G are zero-sequence, not negative sequence.  Negative-sequence would be 59Q.

RE: 51G protection


Thank you, David.  I goofed.
  

RE: 51G protection

tulum,

The zero-sequence voltage detection is just three PTs - grounded wye on the primary and broken delta on the secondary.  You put a voltage relay (in parallel with a resistor to prevent ferro-resonance) across one corner of the secondary delta.  The voltage that shows up there is 3Vo, so it is good indicator of a ground fault.  There can be some harmonic voltages present, so the 59G relay often is equipped with some filtering.  

Blackburn's Protective Relaying or the old Westinghouse Applied Protective Relaying books have better explanations.  

RE: 51G protection

(OP)
Much thanks to all.

Regards,
TULUM

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources