×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Family table instance always need verified in ilink?

Family table instance always need verified in ilink?

Family table instance always need verified in ilink?

(OP)
We are using wildfire 2.0 and intralnk 3.3.  Every time I make a new instance in a family table, the entire table has to be verified.  Sometimes when checking in assemblies, intralink says that I need to verify/regenerate the family table of assemblies/parts.  If i am not making any changes (like adding a column for a cut in the table) to the table itself shouldn't it just verify just the new instance?  Some tables have 50-100 parts and is staring to take up some time.  Any comments or helpful tips would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Ben

RE: Family table instance always need verified in ilink?

What build of 3.3 are you running. There is a bug in M021 with assembly family tables and it has been replaced by M022.

"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
CAD/CAM System Analyst
Ingersoll-Rand

RE: Family table instance always need verified in ilink?

Build M01 sure seemed to work well... but it ALSO has that instance issue... in fact... once I did the upgrade to it.. Instances that beloged to generics that had been renamed no longer saw the generic!!! The Horror as generics were verified and could not be saved due to the "same name exists"... the instances were all be considered new!!...

The cure, though painful to have to do, was to rename the generic back to it's old name, verify and save it... then rename it back again to its "new" name...

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources