×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

(OP)
Guys,

Any idea?

APH

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

In-lbf is the correct one which is force multiplied by displacement meaning energy/work or moment/torque. The others are just length unit multiplied by mass which has no meaning.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

my 2 cents
I've seen torque expressed as in-lbs, but work as in-lbf.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

SI units differentiate mass and force.

In text documents I would write the word inch-pound.  My data sheets usually include a pull-down menu with available units.

Do not add the letter "s" to indicate plural units  --  inch not inches, pound not pounds, lb not lbs.  There is a nice guideline in the Fundamentals of Engineering handbook in the earlier chapters.

John

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

in-lb is a unit of energy or work. If you want moment or torque it should be expressed in lb-ft.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

The question is what are you trying to express? lbf is a unit of force, while lb is a often used as a unit of mass.

TTFN

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

(OP)
I'm trying to specify torque requirement on screws.

Thanks
APH

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

In school, we used lbf and lbm to help avoid confusion between mass and force in the English system.  I still do this.

The worst offenders, however, are the ones who dare to use m·kg or cm·g for torque!

"When everyone is thinking alike, no one is thinking very much." --Eckhard Schwarz (1930--2004)
http://www.EsoxRepublic.com

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

Any one of the three.  I haven't checked, but I'll bet my torque wrench doesn't show "lbf" on it, and you'd be writing it for the people doing the tightening.

Usually, the application will indicate whether the pounds are mass or force, and where you're specifying a torque, nobody's going to confuse it with mass.

Whether it's in feet or inches is immaterial.  Work or torque can be expressed either way.

Gripe of the day:  After learning the SI system over and over all through school, I discover all these foreign countries that use the metric system are giving stresses in kilograms per square centimeter.  So much for SI.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

The problem is using a mass unit (gram or kilogram) instead of a force unit (newton!!!!!).

Regards,

Cory

Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

It's a problem not because of the cm, but because kg is a unit of mass, not stress.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

D'oh! I meant kg is mass, not force.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

Actually, they mean kg-f, doing the same thing with kilograms that we do with pounds, using as units of both force and mass.  Which is "metric", but not SI.  Probably dates from 100 years ago, too.  Proper units would be MPa.  You'll also see units from cgs system still in use, which is also metric, but not SI.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

My "vote" is for lb-in for torque.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

I always distinguish between lbf and lbm (I never leave off the "f" for force and sometimes add the "m" for mass)- just the way I was trained, but it also prevents confusion. I also agree with zekeman - force first for torque, displacement first for work/energy. So for torque it should be lbf-in or just lbf in. But an awful lot of people either don't know or don't care about the sequence distinction.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

JStephen,
MPa = Newton per mm square, it is the unit for stress or pressure.
kgf was used to make clear that we were talking about force (=9.81 N) not that long ago - say 20 years or so.
It was mostly this confusion what finally initiated  establishing the Newton as a unit of force.
The lbf and lbm should be used to show what are we talking about. But they are not...

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

I meant the practice of using kg/cm2 probably started 100 years ago, not that it was abandoned then.  I know that it is STILL used by various steel mills.  It may be shown as kg-f rather than just kg, but the intent is clear in either case.

It appears the SI system dates from 1960, based on a quick web search.  When I started college in 1979, it was in use, with no suggestion that it was new.

RE: Which one is correct, in-lbf. or in-lbs., or in-lb.

My only recent use of kg/cm2 was on a Pemex project.  Most international projects use kPascal for pressure.

John

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources