×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Rankine Analysis Questions

Rankine Analysis Questions

Rankine Analysis Questions

(OP)
Hi All,

I am looking to design wingwalls for a culvert.  The height of retained earth is approx. 17.5 ft. (worst case).  The soil is a clayey/silty loam with cobbles.  Soil assumptions are an E.F.P of 45 psf (Geotech Report), Soil Weight = 120 pcf, and angle of internal friction = 20 deg. (Std Handbook) My question is - What is the difference between a Rankine analysis vs. an Equivalent Fluid Pressure analysis for retaining wall design?  I'm running RetainPro 6.0 software and the Rankine anaysis method gives me a much more conservative design.  Is there any correlation between the E.F.P of a soil and its angle of internal friction?  Is there any reason to prefer one analysis over the other, other than potential savings on concrete?  Any advice would be appreciated.

RE: Rankine Analysis Questions

Rankine is a equivelent fluid pressure analysis. Rankine refers to the method to compute the lateral earth pressure coeficent, which is the ratio of lateral load to vetical load. First, there are two types of lateral pressure for wall design: active, where the wall is allowed to rotate slightly, or at rest, where the wall is not allowed to rotate. For a culvert wingwall, I would recomend at rest pressure. This is usually .45 to .55. If you are using active there are several was to compute, of which rankine is the most consevative. The soil is a clayey/silty loam which may have some cohesion, which may have been acounted for in the equivelent fluid pressure value. The best thing to do is call the geotech and dicuss with him. If you are using his values,, you have a right and an obligation to understand what the values represent.

RE: Rankine Analysis Questions

dweiman,

45psf/vf is too little to be an at rest pressure and too little to be a Rankine active pressure using 120 pcf and 20 degrees.  Possibly the geotech used a Coulomb active earth pressure coefficient with some type of downward sloping ground sruface behind the wall.  As DRC1 suggested, ask the geotech where he got the 45 psf pressure.

RE: Rankine Analysis Questions

(OP)
DRC1, PEinc,

Thanks for your time.  I ended up staying with the Rankine analysis using the 120 pcf and 20 deg. angle of internal friction.  The client ended up going to the culvert precaster for the wingwalls, ultimately to reduce the size of the footings, which were going to interfere with some proposed drainage.  Thanks again.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources