×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Expansion Joint

Expansion Joint

Expansion Joint

(OP)
We came across a little issue with our process drains and are now forced to pipe a safety/relief valve to a common header in order avoid further damage.  However in 'good engineering practice' this was supposed to be piped in order to avoid and undo stresses during operation with pipe travel.  I was thinking of having a bellows expansion joint fabricated, would this be against boiler or B31.1 power piping code and has anyone come across this issue before.  This is a safety valve off our FW pump with 3000 psi @ 330F.

RE: Expansion Joint

Not sure I understand your question.  Was the SRV discharge already hard-piped to the relief header?

Since you are on the discharge of an SRV, your downstream pressure will be far below the inlet pressure so you need to first estimate the outlet pressure in the relief line when the valve goes off and then use that pressure for the bellows sizing.  

I do not think 31.1 disallows bellows-type expansion joints but I would have to check to be sure.

If you look at the bellows manufacturer's catalogs, you will find their upper pressure limit.

There are other ways around this problem.  If you are inexperienced in the application of bellows-type expansion joints, I suggest you hire a competent piping engineer or a very experienced piping designer to help you with this.  Bellows are not to be treated lightly.  They are always the last resort in addressing piping flexibility problems and can cause a heck of a lot more problems than they solve if not applied correctly.

Thanks!
Pete

RE: Expansion Joint

I would definitely explore piping flexibility more before pursuing and expansion joint.  3000 psig is going to be tough to design for - your plies are going to be pretty thick to retain that kind of pressure.

Edward L. Klein
Pipe Stress Engineer
Houston, Texas

"All the world is a Spring"

All opinions expressed here are my own and not my company's.

RE: Expansion Joint

(OP)
Thanks guys, it seems to be the general consensus with this issue. We originally had the SRV piped to process drains under the structural foundation, which has since collapsed.  This being a temp fix while we work out the details of the bigger issue. I was very much trying to avoid having an expansion loop designed because of the number of unknown factors involved with travel and undue stress on the SRV discharge.
Also B31.1 is so thorough I really think it would be a violation somewhere.

Thanks again

RE: Expansion Joint

What your are proposing is possible and is done.
Check out the following website and look at the 'SAFETY RELIEF VALVE VENT CONNECTORS' brochure.

http://www.americanboa.com/lite.htm

As stated above, the advice of a competent piping design engineer well versed in the art and science of same needs to be considered.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources