×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers
4

Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

(OP)
I work for a electrical distribution utility. This past season we have had over a dozen transformers that were struck by lightning, resulting in the transformer spliting from the top of the transforer close to the primary bushing and down to the tap changer (we use dual voltage 7.2kV/14.4kV transformers). Our current method of connection is from the overhead line, through the cutout and then to the primary bushing. The arrester is connected by connecting a jumper from the bushing wire to the top of the arrester. The arrester lead is grounded to the tank ground.

It seems to me that this connection will incourage a ligtning surge to go through the bushing, resulting in our tank-splitting problem. Does this seem logical?

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

The arrester have to be as near as possible to the equipment to be protected.
The arrester have to be between the incoming line and the equipment to be protected.


Lmax  = {{v [ BIL / (1 + Mp)] – Ures } / 2 x S} - (H arrester  + H structure)


Where:         
Lmax : max allowable distance between arrester and equipment(m)
H arrester : Height of arrester (m)
H structure : Height of structure(m)
V : velocity of wave propagation (m/ms) » 300 m/ms for overhead lines
                                                          150 m/ms for cables
BIL: Basic insulation level of equipment to be protected (kV)
Mp : protective margin required : Minimum IEC recommendation = 20%
Ures : Residual voltage of arrester (kV)
S : Steepness of incoming wave (kV/ms) » 2000kV/ms

Protective distances
kV        max distance
11           on trsf tank
22           on trsf tank
33           3m
44           5m
66           6m
88           6m
132          7m
275          18m
400          24m


Regards

Ralph

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers


Basic overvoltage-protection concepts are partially addressed in IEEE Std C62.22.1-1996 …Connection of Surge Arresters to Protect Insulated, Shielded Electric Power Cable Systems  

A significant improvement can be achieved by reducing the “open air” cross-sectional area enclosed by the arrester, jumpers and transformer bushings/can.
  

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Our system is 12470V (7200V L-G).

Our practice is to mount the arrestor beside the transformer's 'cutout' disconnect switch, with the 'hot' lead connected in parallel with the source side of the cutout, and then the arrestor is connected to ground below the transformer's ground connection, and then sharing a common ground wire down the pole to earth.

The cutout is usually ~1m from the transformer bushing.

It was felt that this maximizes the arrestor's ability to 'shunt' the lightning surge around the transformer.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

You may also want ot review your grounding practices.  An arrestor's ability to redirect energy away from other equipment is only as good as the overall impedance to 'true earth'.

If the local connection to earth is poor, the near-zero impedance of a MOV arrestor will still not be a very good shunt, since it is in series with the ground wire and earth grounding.

We have found that simply using a single ground rod is insufficient if the local ground resistivity is high (soil conditions are rocky, etc.).

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

(OP)
Tinfoil, that seems like a logical connection.

One of the reasons I was told we connect from the cutout to the arrester (in series) is that the cutout will blow and indicate that the arrester needs to be changed out. Otherwise, the arrester may be bad and no one ever knows it. Sometimes the arresters that have blown look normal from the outside (from what I was told).

With respect to the arrester ground lead connection, we currently connect it to the tank ground. I also thought it would make more since to connect it directly to ground, but I read some previous posts that said connecting to the tank would reduce the induced L di/dt voltage between the windings and the tank inside the transfomrer.

Any thoughts?

Thanks for all of your responses.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

I'll back Ralph's advice here. Tinfoil's 1 M lead length (2 M from the bushing?) on the line side sounds very long. And the insulation to be protected is that between the bushing and the transformer can. True earth is a long way away (high impedance to the high frequency components of a wavefront). Connect between bushing and can keeping leads as short as possible.  Might want to look into secondary protection as well.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

(OP)
Isn't the idea to have the arrester drain the surge before it hits the bushing? Seems like you would be accomplishing that by Tinfoil's design. The impedance should be lower through the pole ground than through transformer.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

trying undestand original post...

What is meant by transfomer splitting? is the case splitting? or the winding is blwon to pieces or both?

Sounds like the arrester never worked, all energy is passing through the transfomer case or winding.

 tinfoil's point equally valid. You better have good earth connection to dissipate the energy. Current has to compelete the circuit and it will take path of least impedance.

Although you want to connect to the 'can' but not depend on the 'can' to carry the surge current, rather have a solid condcutor all the way down to good earth electrode system. (using a pad or lug on the can as junction).

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers


USDA-RUS bulletin 1724e300

4.3.5 Surge Arresters  Transformers, regulators, and other substation equipment are particularly sensitive to transient overvoltages. For the highest degree of equipment protection, surge arresters should be installed as close as practical to the equipment being protected. In most instances, power transformers can be furnished with surge arrester mounting brackets to facilitate installation. Separate arrester stands can also be used, or the arresters can be installed on adjacent switching structures. For voltage regulator applications, the surge arresters are normally installed directly on the regulator tanks.

[i]When power transformers are protected by fuses, it is recommended that transformer surge arresters be connected on the line side of the fuses, as close as practical to the power transformers. This will minimize the stress on the fuse and help avoid partial melting of the fuse link when the surge arrester responds to a transient overvoltage.{/i}
   

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

(OP)
Transformer splitting meaning the case split open. We've had over 12 react the same way this year. I'd say it's time to change our connection.

Thanks for your help.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

joozu,

No the idea is to prevent over stressing the transformer insulation. Adding lead length (inductance) to either the line or ground side will increase the voltage at the can. See Ralph's post.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Insulation is not failing, the transformer can is coming apart at seams...sounds like stress or uneven expansion caused by overcrrent/heating..

Change the connectins such that current does not pass through the can's skin, but through the conductor. Although attach the conductor to the can so can is grounded too.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

I agree with Ralph and Stevenal.  The shorter the leads the better because surges travelling through the leads impose an additional voltage on the transformer because of L·di/dt.

The transformer "splitting" may be caused by high fault currents on a failed transformer rather than by the surge voltage directly.  Backup current limiting may be used to prevent this.  See
http://www.sandc.com/webzine/021003_1.asp
http://www.sandc.com/edocs_pdfs/EDOC_001654.pdf http://www.cooperpower.com/Library/TheLine/pdf/990...

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

I think most important point is connecting the surge arrestor directly to ground through shortest and adequately sized leads. The ground means true ground and as others suggested it may be necessary to go in for more than one driven earth electrode to obtain low earth resistance.
Equally important is the rating of surge arrestor. If we consider the 11kV system to be solidly grounded type, a 9kV rated surge arrestor should be appropriate and the type shall preferrably be metal-oxide, gap-less.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Just curious, are these dual bushing transformers? If so, where is the grounded primary lead connected?

I wouldn't be as concerned for the actual impedance to earth as the total impedance between the arrestor and the transformer. You are trying to minimize the transient voltage seen by the transformer, therefore the arrestor ground should be connected close to the transformer tank ground.

The arrestor voltage rating is important. Also make sure your fuses and arrestors have adequate interrupting ratings.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

While it is helpful to have a low resistance earth electrode, the important factor for transformer protection is limiting the surge voltage across the transformer insulation.  Minimizing the length of the lead from the top of the arrester to the bushing and the bottom of the arrester to the transformer tank (at the bracket where the arrester is mounted on the tank) does this by minimizing L·di/dt in the leads.  The voltage across the transformer insulation is the voltage across the arrester (Front-of-Wave or discharge) plus the L·di/dt drop in the leads.  The voltage to true ground of the earth electrode is imposed on both the arrester ground and the transformer tank, so it does not increase the voltage across the transformer insulation.  Low earth electrode resistance will reduce surge voltage on the line and improve overall line performance.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Also I would think the connection between the
tank and the local earth ground must be very good.
Otherwise there is a high potential between the primary
and secondary which is surely well grounded at the load.
So inadequate pole ground could contribute

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

The primary ground is connected to the secondary ground. If the secondary is well grounded, so is the primary and the arrester.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

See the enclose picture used by many utilities similar to the case described.



Notice that there is not shield wire to protect from direct or near lightning strike. Traveling wave could create severe overvoltage at the transformer primary side resulting in component damage.
Possible mitigation strategy is considering installing line arrester and/or OH shield wire.
The table below shows the line performance against the number of flashover for different configurations

               Summary of results of the studies at
                       100 Ohms footing resistance

        
Case              Configuration                 Total Flashovers Per 100 km/yr
I                      No Protection                                  20.41
II                     OHSW Alone                                  13.92
I                      Arresters Top 2 Phase
                        Alternate Structures
                       No OHSW                                      14.68
II                   Arresters Lower Phase
                       Alternate Structures –
                       Plus OHSW                                    9.21
III                    Arresters All Phases
                       Every Third Structure                      18.16
III                   Arresters All Phases
                       Alternate Structures                      15.26
III                    Arresters Top Phases
                       Every Structure                             10.35
III                    Arresters All Phases
                       Every Structure                                     0
=====================================================================
NOTE:  Arresters on the top phase of every structure results in a 26% improvement over shield wire alone. Therefore, for new construction the elimination of the shield wire and use of top phase arresters results in a better performing line.
Reference:
http://www.hubbellpowersystems.com/powertest/liter...

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

(OP)
Update: I asked around at some of our surrounding utilities that use the same transformers we use. We seem to be the only utility having multiple xfmr failure due to lightning. The only difference I could determine was our connection. All the utilities I called make the connection that Cooky depicted above. We connect from the cutout to the bushing, but tap a jumper from the bushing line to the top of the arrester. The arrester lead is connected to the tank ground. I found out we also had some fail the same way where the arrester was connected up with the cutout on an L-bracket, where the ground lead went directly to the pole ground.

I also found out that the transformers are splitting from the tap changer up to the bushing (determined by the fact that some of our xfmrs only split from the tap changer but not all the way to the top). Too bad we cant attach pics to this.

Based on the responses I'm thinking of changing to Cooky's connection, but running the arrester ground directly to the pole ground. I just can't see putting a lightning surge through the tank. I can't see how the L di/dt will make much of a difference with such a small transformer. Increasing the ground wire size may be beneficial as well.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Some areas have more than their fair share of lightning. Pittsburgh, for instance, has a lot of lightning due to the mountain uplift making thunderstorms more severe.

Lightning protection is only as good as the ground. If your soil has very few rocks you can use a Borit or Borzit ( 2 competitive companies ) to sink a 1.25 inch copper of steel water pipe way deep into the ground. Figure your budget on the basis that you will have to leave the drill bit at the bottom of the hole.

This is a cheap hand held directional drilling machine to which you hook up a water hose and an air drill. Their directions say that you can use an electric drill of the type that electricians use to drill holes in woodwork but an air compressor is cheap insurance.

Do not forget to use Burndy Penetrox A or A13 or Ideal Noalox on galvanized pipe threads. For copper or bronze pipe use Penetrox E.


Mike Cole, mc5w@earthlink.net

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

One difficulty with connecting the arrestor in parallel with the transformer bushing, downstream of the cutout fuse, is that the arrestor is then 'removed from service' if the fuse blows or the switch is manually opened.

Often, xmfr arrestors are the ONLY ones installed in the system for miles around.  The lightning surge would then have to find another path to earth, likely damaging one or more insulators (which can be a bitch to find in the middle of the night during an electrical storm!).

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

And cause a poletop fire.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Some clarification on this post is still needed, I believe. This is that this type of connection with a single ground rod is only allowable per NESC C2-1997, allowed per rule 97B, and 97C. The 97C requires at least 4-grounds minimum per mile on the MGN. Otherwise 2-separate ground rods are required, and separated by 20 foot, and a spark-gap.

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Many utilties within the USA do not adhere perfectly to NESC standards.

Most utilities outside of the USA have not even heard of the NESC standarda!  ;)

RE: Transformer-Arrester Connection on Pole-Mount Transformers

Here in the mountains of North Carolina two ground rods can not always be seperated by more than a few feet due to the rocky terrain and the other existing utilities. We use a single 17' ground rod (a 10' section coupled with a 7' section) along with #2 stranded copper conductor up the pole. Since we began this practice six years ago, we have seen a significant reduction in the amount of lighting damage to our own and our customer's equipment.

Happiness is a way of travel, not a destination.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources