×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

(OP)
Hello all,
Appendix P.3 (2003 addendum) now allows to evaluate stresses at nozzle-to-shell intersections due to external nozzle loads.
Tank parameters (d/tn), (t/tn) and (u) determine equations (or curves) for calculating the stress factors.
The three sample problems given in the code deal with cases only when value (d/tn) lies between two fixed curves (say, d/tn = 10 and d/tn = 30). Solution is achieved by interpolation between the two. Easy enough!

Now what if values (d/tn) and (t/tn) both lie between the fixed values. Say (d/tn) = 17 (between 10 and 20) and (t/tn) = 1.6 (between 1 and 2). What do you do then? Does one have to interpolate twice, first for (d/tn) and then for (t/tn)? Will it be acceptable to just solve two equations:
1)    d/tn = 10, t/tn = 1 and
2)    d/tn = 30, t/tn = 2.

Any help will be greatly appreciated!
Many thanks

RE: API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

ANK72-

Glad to see the new appendix being used!

You may interpolate twice, once for T/t and once for d/t.

Remember that you are one of the first users of this appendix and there may be some bugs to work out. I'd suggest that you use the equations for the interpolations and then check them against the graphs. If you have any issues, please let me know.

jt

RE: API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

(OP)
jt
Thanks a lot for advice. That's exactly what I did - interpolated twice. As soon as I had a good look at the graphs it all made sense.  
However, I found that the “u” value for one of my nozzles was marginally outside the upper limit of the graph (one of the two). The graph ends at u=1 and my calculated value is 1.24. I had no choice but extrapolate. Hope it is acceptable.
I’m putting together an Excel spreadsheet at the moment (with lookup and macro loops) and I’m afraid that cases like this might screw up the logic. The upper limit of “u” will determine the applicable nozzle-to-shell geometry range.  
JT, thank you again. I needed reassurance.
ak

RE: API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

(OP)
Someone was quick to insert a (commercial) hyperlink into my thread. So annoying!!!
Anyway, I've just found some inconsistencies in Appendix P.3.
I hope jt will be able to comment.

The "Upper limit (u)" presented in Tables P-2 through P-4 contain some errors. Some of the graphs representing the equations given in these tables have totally different limits.
For example Equation # 30 shows the upper limit value of U=5. The graph for this equation (Fig P-8E) ends at U=0.3.
The divisions on the U-axis of all graphs seem to have an error as well. The value 0.11 is supposed to be 0.1. This last one may be due electronic distortion though.
Our company subscribes to API standards and we have internet access to electronic copies. Can someone please check their hard copies to see if it is different?
Regrads
AK

RE: API 650, Appendix P.3 - Not a clear cut!!!

AK-

Can you send the details of your problem to esto2 at aol dot com? I don't usually check mail on that address, but I'll keep an eye on it for the next few days. I'm transitioning into a period of being extremely busy, but I'll try to get some answers for you. If I can't help, I'll get in touch with someone who can. Again, the appendix is brand new and likely needs to have some bugs worked out.

jt

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources