×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Different material?

Different material?

Different material?

(OP)
Hi there,
I was told by my supplier that the below samples A & B are of the same material JIS SCM415 (Chrome Molydenum Steel), I really have my doubt. Can anyone advise.
Below id the hardness data (HV 0.3)
depth    A    B
0.05    762    738
0.1    746    744
0.2    645    755
0.3    532    758
0.4    463    712
0.5    438    684
0.6    420    644
0.7    410    621
0.8    405    570
0.9    400    527
core    385    516
        
According to them, both samples are different by the heat treatment process. But I really doubt that with 0.15% C, the core hardness can go up to >500 HV.

Best regards,
ct

RE: Different material?

Hi,
you are probably right.
Why not asking the supplier to get you
an independent chemical analysis just of C,
or an X-Ray fluorescence test of both samples?
The answer should settle the question.
Mix up of materials can occur.
Regards,

http://www.welding-advisers.com/

RE: Different material?

Were the components carburized?  SCM415 is often used for carburizing, and the hardness values that you indicated are typical for a carburized part.  Depending on the C potential and the treatment time, a hardness of > 500 HV at 1 mm can definitely be achieved in SCM415.  How far below the surface was the "core" measurement taken?  Have you etched the cross-section to see the affected zone?

RE: Different material?

(OP)
Both parst were carburised.
But I think I gotta go for chemical analysis, that would give me the answer right away.
I agree that 500HV is achievable by SCM415, but to control the part to this extent doesn't seem to be practical, at least from economic stand point.

Best regards,
ct

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources