×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mechanical Desktop vs AutoCAD

Mechanical Desktop vs AutoCAD

Mechanical Desktop vs AutoCAD

(OP)
I am a big AutoCAD fan and LOVE the functionality of express tools and models for updating and standardizing drawings. How much of the functionality translates to the mechanical desktop?
The Autodesk website says "some of the base features" I'm concerned with the commands like layer isolate, layer on/off, Osnap Tracking, etc.
I am supporting an engineering department that uses 2005lt (and not very well) so I change alot of layers and text and center alot of objects, so these functions are crucial to me.
Does anyone have any experience with Mechanical/Inventor 9?
Thanks!

RE: Mechanical Desktop vs AutoCAD

If you draw in 2D, Mechanical (not MDT) may be nice for you because it enforces layer standards and entity creation within AutoCAD. We have found that drawings within our company are very consistent, even though we have plants in Germany, Brazil, and the United States.

"Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects." — Will Rogers

RE: Mechanical Desktop vs AutoCAD

If you're moving to 3D, MDT6 was good years ago, but Iv-9 is far superior. Direct compatibility with 2D ACAD dwgs is not emphasized in Iv-9, however. Keep your ACAD (or-LT) running, for access to your existing database.

Use Iv-9 for your forward-reaching work. Don't lose time and money integrating old versions of MDT into your work processes.

2D ACAD-Mechanical is also VERY strong. I've used it with GREAT success in hybrid 2D/3D ACAD situations where I needed to do 3D modeling built upon existing 2D drawings (and connect with them). YES you can directly connect 2D dwgs to your std ACAD-3D modeling including components and assemblies.

However, if your company is seriously looking at upgrading, don't even fool with half-steps. Get a GOOD CAD software vendor, and include MAINTENNANCE, SUPPORT, AND TRAINING  in the upgrade budget. Too many well meaning managers have attempted the upgrade without some of these steps, and have lost BIG in the process. I even know DIRECTLY of an Engineering Manager who was "Laid Off" after a spectacular failure because he tried to "save" money on his upgrade. Either budget to do it right, or maximize your existing implementation and move forward. There's no way to shorten the process.

Good Luck !

C. Fee

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources