×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

2 part epoxy for aircraft components

2 part epoxy for aircraft components

2 part epoxy for aircraft components

(OP)
We are assembling an antenna for use on miliatry Jet aircraft need recommendations on a 2 part epoxy that is used to fill in part of the antenna.

In discussions with a co-worker, I've mentioned factors listed below for the choice of the epoxy, such as:
1) room temp cure is convenient in manufacture
2) coefficient of expansion should match the housing
3) resistance to jet fuel and hydraulic fluid is nice
4) toxic fumes when the material burns aren't good
5) ease of re-work may be a factor.

The specific question is;
a) can anyone recommend a two part epoxy for this use
b) what performance criteria is important for this epoxy.

Thanks,
kch (antenna engineer)

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

(OP)
Thanks Cory,
My reasoning for the question was to find out if there is a high of level of concern by Engineers for materials used in aircraft, specifically regarding noxious fumes when burned and their resistance to chemicals (JP-#, Hydraulic fluid), which is something I'm not to familiar with.
These items don't have high visibility in the websites, especially the noxious fumes. I fear choosing/recommending materials that after 30 months of testing a military customer may inform me that the material is aero-non-grata and force me to change to the standard approved material that everyone knows about.
Is there a rule of thumb for materials that are used in aircraft construction, such as ?X-type rubber, type Z? foam, type Y epoxy, etc? Is there an approved materials list anywhere?
kch

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

Are you working on interior or exterior components?  I would guess that you are working interior and that is why you are concerned with smoke?  I am sure that I could give you some guidance but I need a little more information on what you are working on.

www.carbonfibersolutions.com

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

(OP)
It's for external antennas typically.
Years ago I was involved in specifying materials that went into electronics inside a military aircraft and they were very concerned how the materials burned, and that they not create noxious fumes for the pilot and crew.
We use epoxy to bond alot of materials together in our antennas. I was curious if anyone had experience with different epoxies used in aircraft components. Or am I overly concerned with the makeup of the epoxy I choose in regard to noxious fumes.
Thanks,
kch

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

Toxic smoke is generally not a concern for things like antennae mountings.

Two decent epoxies I've worked with are 3M 3501 and 3M 2216.

These are pretty standard aerospace structural adhesives that have been approved for use many times.

Good Luck.

SuperStress

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

(OP)
Thanks Superstress,

Kevin.

RE: 2 part epoxy for aircraft components

Hi Higgler,

If you want to minimize outgassing, match thermal expansion, and be re-workable you might consider a silicone material.  There are several RTVs that we use for aerospace components - there is a 3145 that I believe conforms to MIL-24624...

But if you need a structural potting material there are several very rigid materials available - Dow Corning is the manufacturer of choice in my line of work - "Stycast" 2652 is a particular fave.

Epoxies are typically stiff and may embrittle or crack if they are exposed to temperature extremes.  I would recommend the silicone approach if you do not need structural support but need to keep an environmental seal across a broad range of operating temperatures.  Epoxies are also sometimes very aggressive during their curing and will shrink and cause damage to fine wires that pass out of the potting.

Cheers

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources