I am having difficulty specifying a proper surface finish for the gland surfaces of a static vacuum o-ring face seal. The drawing currently specifies a 16 microinches Roughness Average. The vendor has supplied parts with a few large pits of depth greater than 4 times the specified avg of 16 and claims the average roughness of the entire surface is still below 16. These large pits may increase the vacuum leak rate. Is there a more detailed method of specifying surface finish that would minimize these anomalies?
Red Flag Submitted
Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts. The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.
Reply To This Thread
Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.
The automotive parts aftermarket is a 2 trillion-dollar business. Major OEMâ€™s like General Motors are eager to win a substantial portion of that market in one of the most difficult supply chain systems in the world. Download Now
Designers in every industry are being pushed to produce larger and more complex product assembles. Add to that the demands that new software features place on your hardware, and you can be in for some serious performance issues. Download Now