×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

How a bell mouth affects flow

How a bell mouth affects flow

How a bell mouth affects flow

(OP)
Hi there, I hope you can help. I am working on an inlet manifold for a 4 cylinder turbocharged engine.

Without a flowbench I cannot anser this so I hope someone on here can, what is the optimum position for a bellmouth in relation to the wall of the plenum. EG Where the inlet runner enters the plenum, how far into the plenum should the bell mouth protrude?

Thanks in advance.

RE: How a bell mouth affects flow

For overall best power, I think the runner entry should be flush with the plenum wall.  But because of packaging this is not always possible, without compromising runner length.  Therefore the designer combines the desired runner length, the desired plenum volume, and the exterior constraints, and the amount of protrusion becomes the dependant variable.

RE: How a bell mouth affects flow

(OP)
Thankyou for your help, it's much appreciated.

Mark

RE: How a bell mouth affects flow

Would it be desirable to follow the air flow pattern and see in what way it enters each bell mouth? Depending on the shape of the entry port to the plenum, I'd hazard a guess at the furthest bell mouth (let's call it number 4 of 4, at the far end of the plenum) receiving the highest volume of air, due to it travelling horizontally along the plenum and hitting the far end, deflecting it downwards. This would result in bell mouth 4 being the first to be fed. Then I'd imagine that mouth by mouth back towards the entrance port (i.e. going back from 4-1) that less and less air would be received.

So, if this is a correct assumption, would it be fair to say that profiling the entry to each bell mouth according to this distribution of air to tune the amount drawn into each runner would even out this distribution? By this I mean that a large "lip" on bell mouth number 1, a smaller lip on 2, and even smaller on 3, and perhaps no lip on 4, would cause each bell mouth to "attract" the air flow in varying degrees which might go some way to cancelling out the unequal flow of air into the bell mouths that I described at the top of this reply.

Does anyone understand and/or agree with any of this?

James.

RE: How a bell mouth affects flow

The Hydraulic Institute (now ANSI) standards have a whole section on how to design and fix wet wells which can have many pumps drawing from a common sump.  One of their requirements is good relatively un-disturbed inlet flow because pumps HATE inlet vortices and stuff.  I never checked the Reynolds numbers, but it sure looked like "their" problems are similar to "our" problems.

RE: How a bell mouth affects flow

This is all making me think more and more that a one-into-four construction for the charge carrier-inlet leaders might be a better approach, space permitting. This would do away with the plenum altogether, and perhaps reduce the chance of uneven amounts of charge being delivered to each chamber. A similar setup is used on turbocharged motorbikes, which have a tiny amount of distance to get all four exhaust pipes into one large pipe to bolt to the turbo. All four are brought together into one to meet the turbo, so if this is reversed and the one pipe (charge-carrying pipe from turbo) is mated up with the four leaders in such a way that an even mass flow rate is delivered to each leader, it would surely do away with the problems you're facing with the current plenum/bell mouth/leader idea?

 I know space isn't at a premium, so maybe this, along with the cost aspect, is a stupid idea anyway! I'm sure you could slap a sleek bonnet bulge on if you wanted to try it and needed an inch or few extra above.

James.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources