×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

(OP)
I do not know if there is a code or regulation to select between packing system and mechanical seals in oil pumps. I think the selection has to depend on pressure, viscosity and temperature. Or is it obligatory to use mechanical seals in oil applications? I have consulted API 610, 685, 682 and ASME B73.3M but I have not found a concrete advice.

Is there any table that relates product, pressure, viscosity and temperature with use of packing and mechanical seals?


Thanks in advance,

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Mechanical seals are better for oil service because of lower if any leakage.  Packing will require a certain amount of leakage for lubrication.

Leakage is a potential fire problem and is to be avoided as much as possible.

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Mechanical seals are definately preferred to packing in many services.  Solids and temperature need to be checked carefully.  Solids will accumulate at the Mechanical Seal bellows area if not flushed properly thus causing early failure.  Temperature is also a problem. Recently a customer using Thermanol at 275F was having problems with coking at the seal bellows area. Found out that the Thermanol heating element was alowing the temp to rise above the 350F coking point in the heater with pieces of coke entering the seal chamber causing failures.  We converted them over to a no leak packing from Slade industries.  Quite expensive but it worked like a dream. The customer couldn't have been happier.  Slade will perform on site installation of their packing systems. As a Flowserve Seal Distributor geting away from our primary product line was a tough decision, but the customers needs dictated which way we went.

Popeye

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Poppeye,

Doesn't Flowserve have a line of graphite packing? I've heard the Slade presentation before and I'm skeptical about the stuff.

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Flowserve does have a graphite packing although the factory stuff is a graphite braid and some with a flax base. I do not use the OEM stuff. Just too cheap for me to put my name on in the repairs I supervise.  Fortunately we are not bound by our distributor agreement with the packing.  I do know the Slade packing works.  I too was very skeptical with their presentation.  I took them into my customer and let them put on their dog and pony for them and then let the customer make the decision. The customer was totally and completely fed up with mechanical seals and chose to go with the Slade alternative.  I am now a believer in their product. It works! Believe it or not the hotter the oil the better.  Within 45 minutes of start up, the stuffing box was running 50deg f cooler than the casing with zero leak off.

Poppeye

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Sealing systems are driven by environmental regulations rather than industry standards.  I don't know where you are located but we would never use packing in an oil pump. In fact, packing is rarely ever used even in water service since most water is "treated" in one way or another.

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

Mechanical Seal is the best choice rather than packing, which directly enhance the efficiency of pumps, we used mechanical seal in high temp oil pump & is running successfully from many years.

The proper selection is neccessary

siddik

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

poppeye,  you are correct. slade does make a packing that we beleive, after many trial and errors, that is the best on the market today.  Most all applications today can be sealed without any leakage by using slade and removing seals from equipment.

mogle

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

In response to Popeye, Flowserve does have an improvement to Slade style FGC.
In my experience the highest cost is not always the best and I am certain the FS FGC is lower in price and an improvement over Slade.
Pacwizard

RE: Mechanical seal vs. packing in oil pumps

I want to change tar pumps from packing to mechanical seals but it is possible for a temperature up to 430F the kind of pumps is the LQ4223 from Viking; in my company says that mechanical seals gave a lot of troubles.The packing seals give leakages and I would like to have zero leak. How could I start the proper selection?

Thanks in advance,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources